Leopard 2A5/A6 Delivery
2023.03.27
| Country | Model | Quantity | Delivery Dates | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Germany | Leopard 2A6 | 18 | March 2023 | |
| Portugal | Leopard 2A6 | 3 | March 2023 | |
| Sweden | Strv 122 | 10 | March 2023 | |
| Total Delivered: 21x Leopard 2A6 and 10x Strv 122 | ||||
Leopard 2A4 Delivery
2023.03.27
| Country | Model | Quantity | Delivery Dates | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Poland | Leopard 2A4 | 14 | February 2023 and March 2023 | |
| Norway | Leopard 2A4 | 8 | March 2023 | |
| Spain | Leopard 2A4 | 10 | 6x April 2023 and 4x July 2023 | |
| Canada | Leopard 2A4M CAN | 8 | November 2023 | |
| Netherlands/Denmark | Leopard 2A4 | 14 | Pledged, not yet delivered | |
| Total Delivered: 40x Leopard 2A4 | ||||
DM53-test
2023.05.25
Ukraine received and tested DM53 on the Leopard 2A6 against an old T-62M tank, penetrating it..jpg?id=11431877923&thumbnail=0x150)
Two Leopard 2A6 shooting near Robotyne
2023.06.06 - 47.495474, 35.916756
2023.06.06 Leopard 2A6 is engaging two Russian tanks at a distance of 2.2 km with HE rounds.The Russia tanks can be seen retreating.
We estimate that this likely took place just before the offensive, however the exact date is unknown.
Likely at:
Leopard 2A6 : 47.495474, 35.916756
T-80 BVM : 47.47842°N 35.88704°E (?)
Leopard 2A6 hit by Lancet
2023.06.07 - 47.50706°N 35.82429°E
This Leopard 2A6 belongs to the 47th Mechanized Brigade, provided by Portugal, and was part of the first days of Ukraine's summer offensive 2023. Being part of the western group, it together with a 2nd Leopard 2A6 was responsible for protecting the flank of the central group that was advancing towards Robotyne. Tactical Map. On the first day of the operation it hit mines and was immobilized. Despite being hit by mines, the crew remained in the tank which was in a suitable position to continue to provide overwatch. This can be concluded by the close hatches on the turret.Russia decided to strike this now immobilized tank with a Lancet drone and artillery.
Notice how the hatches were opened.
Near the mantlet the gun barrel is a steel tube with ~80mm thick walls. It would require a very significant force, much greater than a 152mm HE shell, Kornet or Vikhr missile, to tear it off.
Analysis of the Lancet strike.
A total of 115 positions were reconstructed, from which we extrapolated the flightpath for the last missing couple of meters, to determine the impact location and angle.
.png?id=16635921857&thumbnail=0x150)
.png?id=12459034922&thumbnail=0x150)
Projecting this trajectory onto a Leopard schematic shows, that this drone likely impacted on its lower side, with the warhead detonating towards the road wheels.
We conclude that this strike is unlikely to have caused any additional damage, as this side was already damaged by the detonation of a mine, and the warhead was not striking the hull.
.png?id=11031722662&thumbnail=0x150)
.png?id=7717244605&thumbnail=0x150)
.png?id=10913821883&thumbnail=0x150)
A while later, when ukraine soldiers prepared this tank for recovery, we could observe the damage closeup. At this time the black soot was already washed away by the rain. Additionally no damage left by the Lancet could be observed.
Therefore we conclude that this tanks right suspension was damaged by driving over a mine, with sections of the side skirt ripped off. The Lancet drone however only damaged a few smoke pods, leaving no significant damage to the tank itself.
BDA Rating: 6 - Partial Usability (PU)
Damage Description:
- Mine Hit Damage: The mine hit caused severe damage to the right side of the tank. One road wheel was completely ripped out, and neighboring road wheels were also damaged. Additionally, sections of the side skirt were lost due to the blast impact. This damage significantly affects the tank's mobility and protection on the right side.
- Immobilization: As a result of the mine hit, the tank was immobilized. The loss of a road wheel and damage to neighboring ones have rendered the tank unable to move or maneuver effectively, limiting its operational capabilities.
- Lancet Drone Strike: A subsequent Lancet drone strike targeted the right side of the tank, but the damage was limited to one of the turret's smoke pods. Fortunately, the main structure of the turret and critical systems were not affected, indicating that the tank's primary offensive capabilities remain intact.
Overall Assessment:
Considering the damage caused by the mine hit and the Lancet drone strike, the Leopard 2A6 tank is rated as 6 - Partial Usability (PU). While the tank remains partially usable, its effectiveness is limited due to the significant mobility loss on the right side. The damage to the road wheels and side skirt compromises the tank's ability to traverse uneven terrain and hampers its overall stability during maneuvers. However, the tank's primary offensive capabilities, including its main gun and primary turret systems, have not been severely impacted by the Lancet drone strike. This allows the Leopard 2A6 to continue engaging targets effectively, albeit with reduced mobility and protection on the right side.
Decision Making Justification:
Given the rating of 6 - Partial Usability (PU), the decision-making process should prioritize immediate recovery efforts and repairs to restore mobility on the right side. Once the tank is fully mobile and operational, it can continue to contribute effectively to the mission. The damage to the turret's smoke pods can be addressed during routine maintenance without significantly impacting the tank's overall combat capabilities. Overall, the assessment allows military commanders to make informed decisions regarding the deployment of the Leopard 2A6 in its current condition, considering the limitations imposed by the damage and the potential risks associated with its operational capabilities.
Leopard 2A6 in the Bradley Group (Central Group)
2023.06.07 - 47.48999°N 35.88542°E
This Leopard 2A6, donated by Germany, is part of the 47th Separate Mechanized Brigade and lead the central group, forming a bridgehead toward Robotyne. Tactical Map.This video shows the initial advance. At least one Leopard 2R (which later relocated to the eastern group) and likely another mine breach vehicle cleared an initial path. Despite these efforts the vanguard, consisting of one Leopard 2A6 and multiple bradley vehicles hit mines half was down the path and came under fire. They deployed smoke to cover the retreat. The rest of the column, including more Bradley's, and SUVs retreated.
Later footage shows that they tried against with more Bradley's.
.png?id=12041647170&thumbnail=0x150)
.png?id=17598140716&thumbnail=0x150)
.png?id=15776830564&thumbnail=0x150)
BDA Rating: 6 - Partial Usability (PU)
Damage Description:
- Mine Hit Damage: The mine hit caused severe damage to the left rear track of the tank, rendering it immobilized. The damage to the track has made it impossible for the tank to move or maneuver effectively.
- Obstruction: The tank is surrounded by destroyed Bradley IFVs, making it challenging to recover the vehicle. The wrecks are blocking the way and limiting access to the Leopard 2A6.
Overall Assessment:
The Leopard 2A6 tank is rated as 6 - Partial Usability (PU). The tank itself seems to be in good condition, and its primary offensive capabilities have not been compromised. However, the mine strike on the left rear track has immobilized the tank, significantly reducing its mobility and operational capabilities. Additionally, the obstruction caused by the destroyed Bradley IFVs makes it difficult to recover the tank, further limiting its usability in its current location.
Decision Making Justification:
Given the rating of 6 - Partial Usability (PU) and the challenging recovery situation due to the obstructions, a careful decision-making process is required. The priority should be given to clear the path by removing or bypassing the destroyed Bradley IFVs to enable recovery efforts for the Leopard 2A6. Once the tank is freed from the obstructions, repair teams can focus on restoring the damaged left rear track. Given that the tank itself is in good condition and its primary systems are operational, recovery and repairs could potentially restore the tank to a fully usable state. However, if the recovery proves too risky or resource-intensive, and considering the presence of other functional tanks, military commanders might evaluate the strategic value of recovering the immobilized Leopard 2A6 versus the benefits of leaving it behind and focusing on other operational assets.
Leopard 2A6 burned (Western Group)
2023.06.07 - 47.4923°N 35.83802°E
This Leopard 2A6 took part in the offensive near Robotyne and was likely destroyed by a Lancet drone. Video evidence and reports suggests that all the crew escaped unharmed.
Analysis of the loss
Impact to the side by an Lancet Drone
While we have no footage of the tank being hit, the white debris surrounding the tank suggests that it was likely hit by a Lancet type drone on its side.Later the tanks left side, including the external frontal fuel tank, and the rubber on the road wheels are burning brightly.
It is likely the tank was hit on the left fuel tank, causing the fuel tank to ignite and and drip on the ground. Due to the wind direction the smoke raises on the other side of the tank - just as we observed.
The internal fire is possibly caused burning fuel leaking into the crew compartment close to the hull ammunition. This then first resulted in a deflagration of the hull ammunition, and the high temperatures later lead to an ammunition fire in the turret bustle
Another possible scenario would be a ATGM hitting the tank on its left side - on the fuel tank. This impact penetrated the fuel on two sides.
This video shows an ATGM hit on the nearby Bradley (fired by Russias 1430 Regiment).
_001.png?id=15106974672&thumbnail=0x150)
BDA Rating: 2 - Non-functional (NF)
Damage Description:
The Leopard 2A6 tank suffered an ammunition's fire that engulfed the hull, turret bustle, and external fuel tanks. The front portion of the tank is almost fully burned out, while the rear has suffered less damage. It is likely that a Lancet drone caused the fire to start on the right middle section of the tank.
Overall Assessment:
Considering the extent of damage caused by the ammunition's fire, the Leopard 2A6 tank is rated as 2 - Non-functional (NF). The severe fire has rendered the tank non-functional, with the front section almost completely destroyed. While the rear portion sustained less damage, the overall tank remains in one piece. Salvaging certain parts, such as the engine or sights, may be feasible, but the tank's major components have been significantly affected, making it unsuitable for field repairs or operational use.
Decision Making Justification:
Given the rating of 2 - Non-functional (NF), the decision-making process should prioritize recovery efforts and assess the possibility of salvaging useful components like the engine and sights. However, considering the extensive damage to the tank's major components, it is likely that repairs are not feasible. The tank should be recovered to a safe location for further evaluation and potential decommissioning. Parts salvageable from the tank can be used for maintenance of other Leopard 2A6 tanks, if applicable.
Leopard 2A6 behind the burned one (Western Group)
2023.06.07 - 47.4923°N 35.83802°E
This second Leopard 2A6 is in much better condition and was only immobilized. The tank was later recovered (after ~3 weeks). It is unclear what immobilized this tank, as we could not observe any damage in the footage provided.
.png?id=9378767074&thumbnail=0x150)
BDA Rating: 6 - Partial Usability (PU)
Damage Description:
The Leopard 2A6 was disabled in the field for two weeks, and later pulled to the rear. Unfortunately, the exact extent of damage sustained during the initial incident is unclear, making a comprehensive assessment challenging. However, based on the duration of immobilization, it is likely that the tank experienced significant damage affecting its mobility or essential systems.
Overall Assessment:
With a CDURS rating of 6 - Partial Usability (PU), it is evident that the tank can still be operated, but certain features or functions might be impaired. Considering the two-week immobilization period, it is possible that the tank's mobility has been affected, and some non-critical systems may remain compromised.
Decision Making Justification:
Given the uncertainty surrounding the extent of damage, a closer assessment of the Leopard 2A6's condition is required. Immediate maintenance and repairs should be performed to address any identified issues. Once the tank's mobility and critical functions are restored, it can again be utilized in operations.
Leopard 2A4 hit by artillery (West group)
2023.06.07 - 47.501°N 35.9313°E
On the start of the offensive the eastern group was struck by artillery trying to advance. One tank, likely a Leopard 2A4 can be seen burning from the bustle. Due to lack of footage the extend of the damage remains unknown.
_001.png?id=10620218504&thumbnail=0x150)
BDA Rating: 3 - Severely Impaired (SI)
Damage Description:
- Artillery Hit and Ammunition Fire: The Leopard 2A4 was hit by artillery, resulting in an ammunition fire in the turret bustle. Fortunately, the blowout panel worked as intended, limiting the extent of the damage caused by the fire.
- Damage to Electronics: The fire likely caused damage to the adjacent electronics of the fire control system. While the exact extent of the damage could not be observed, it is highly probable that these electronic components were destroyed, affecting the tank's targeting and fire control capabilities.
- Engine and Hull Condition: Upon closer inspection, much of the hull and engine were found to be in better condition than initial footage suggested. The structural integrity of these components appears largely intact.
Overall Assessment:
The Leopard 2A4 tank is assessed with a rating of 3 - Severely Impaired (SI). The primary damage is concentrated in the turret area, particularly affecting the fire control electronics due to the ammunition fire. However, the hull and engine are in relatively good condition, with less impact than initially believed.
Decision Making Justification:
Given the rating of 3 - Severely Impaired (SI), the tank requires extensive repairs, particularly in the turret and electronic systems. While the hull and engine are not severely compromised, the damage to critical systems renders the vehicle non-operational. The focus should be on assessing the full extent of the turret and electronics damage and determining the feasibility of repair versus replacement.
Leopard 2A6 missed by FPV drone targeting turret roof
2023.06.10 - 47.51373°N 35.93178°E
A FPV drone attempts to target this Leopard 2A6 tank, but likely misses based on its trajectory.BDA Rating: 10 - Unaffected (UA)
Damage Description:
A Leopard 2A6 tank was targeted by an FPV drone from above. The drone, however, missed and caused no damage to the tank. The tank's armor successfully withstood the attempted attack, and all critical systems remain fully operational.
Overall Assessment:
The tank is rated as 10 - Unaffected (UA). There is no damage to the tank, and it continues to operate at its full capacity without any signs of degradation. The attempted drone strike had no impact on the tank's functionality, protection, or offensive capabilities.
Leopard 2A4 targeted by FPV drone
2023.06.10 - 47.49196°N 35.94236°E
A FPV drone tries to target this tank, but seemingly overshoots. It likely struck the rear cargo bins if at all. The damage is likely minimal or cosmetic, due to the small payload these drones carry.
.png?id=11922938364&thumbnail=0x150)
.png?id=16483377562&thumbnail=0x150)
.png?id=19187655015&thumbnail=0x150)
BDA Rating: 1 - Catastrophic Loss (CL)
Damage Description:
The Leopard 2A4 tank was fully destroyed by the detonation of its hull ammunition. The force of the detonation was so intense that it sent the turret flying. The exact weapon responsible for destroying the tank is unclear.
Overall Assessment:
The extent of damage caused by the hull ammunition detonation and the resulting destruction of the tank's turret leads to a rating of 1 - Catastrophic Loss (CL). The equipment has experienced a catastrophic failure, rendering it completely non-functional and irreparable. Not even salvageable parts remain.
Decision Making Justification:
In this scenario, there is no possibility of repair or recovery of the tank due to the catastrophic loss of the hull ammunition detonation. The tank is entirely non-functional and beyond restoration to any usable state. Given the severity of the damage and the potential risk to any operators, it is evident that this vehicle cannot be salvaged or restored for any further use.
Two Leopards attacked by two Kornet ATGMs
2023.06.11
id="" vehicleStatus=""> This video shows a Russian ATGM team attacking two Leopard 2A6 tanks. One tank is targeted twice. The first striking it frontally near the rear of the turret (0:20), while the left tank is shooting at some target (0:23). The second ATGM is hitting the ground in front of the tank (1:01). Both tanks can be seen to continue operating after the strikes, with no visible indication for damage. The missile used was likely a 9M133 Kornet. It is notable that following the attack the Leopard 2's used a smoke screen, and the tanks were able to retreat at high speed, keeping the frontal armor towards the enemy.Analysis of the first ATGM strike.
The ATGM likely struck the upper right side of the turret (gunner side) at around 30° (horizontally relative to the side of the hull), with a secondary angle of around 10° (vertically).
To footage however suggests that the hit was further in the back, and we therefore do not list them as the same event.
Here a possible impact location if one takes both events into account:
Analysis of the second ATGM.
Leopard 2A6 attacked by ATGM
2023.07.07
Aftermath of an ATGM strike on a Leopard 2A6. The armor was not perforated. Marcus Faber, a german politician visited the Leopard 2's on the frontline and observed operation and the damaged they suffered.
Analysis
Based on the aftermath footage, we concluded that the armor including the addon, was penetrated by around 300mm, or 200mm without it (marked in blue).
BDA Rating: 9 - Resilient Performance (RP)
Damage Description:
- ATGM Impact 1: The first Anti-Tank Guided Missile (ATGM) struck the tank on the front, targeting the upper right gunner side of the turret. The missile impact was absorbed by the armor, resulting in minimal penetration of at most 300mm into the 750mm armor. The armor itself sustained minimal damage, and no other components were affected.
- ATGM Impact 2: The second ATGM missed its target and hit the ground, failing to cause any damage to the tank.
Overall Assessment:
Based on the damage caused by the ATGM impacts, the Leopard 2A6 tank is rated as 9 - Resilient Performance (RP). The tank sustained minimal damage despite being targeted by two ATGMs. The first missile's impact on the turret was effectively absorbed by the armor, ensuring the tank's resilience and ability to continue operating near its original capabilities. The armor's ability to withstand the ATGM's penetration and the lack of damage to critical components demonstrate the tank's resilient performance in the face of a direct threat.
Decision Making Justification:
Given the rating of 9 - Resilient Performance (RP), minor maintenance is sufficient to restore the Leopard 2A6 tank to its optimal performance. The tank remains highly operational, and its primary offensive and defensive capabilities are unaffected by the ATGM impacts. The damage sustained is well within the tank's design parameters, allowing it to continue participating effectively in combat operations.
Leopard 2A4 hit by Artillery on roof
2023.06.15
This Leopard 2A4 was struck by a 152mm HE Guided Artillery shell (Krasnopol) on the 40mm roof section above the gun. The crew remained unharmed, but significant damage was inflicted on the roof, gunner and commander sights and the turret hatches. The recoil mechanism of the gun is likely damaged as well.
BDA Rating: 4 - Limited Functionality (LF)
Damage Description:
The Leopard 2A4 tank was hit by 152mm artillery on the frontal roof above the gun. The impact caused severe damage, including a cracked roof armor and the destruction of all optics on the roof. The gunner and commander sights were rendered inoperative, along with damage to the periscopes around the hatches and the hatches themselves. Additionally, the impact on the armor likely caused spalling that impacted the gun and its recoil system.
Overall Assessment:
Based on the damage caused by the 152mm artillery hit, the Leopard 2A4 tank is rated as 4 - Limited Functionality (LF). The critical damage to the roof armor and the destruction of the optics severely impact the tank's ability to engage targets effectively. The loss of functionality in the gunner and commander sights significantly impairs the tank's targeting capabilities, hindering its combat effectiveness. Moreover, the damage to the periscopes and hatches poses a safety risk to the crew, as it limits their situational awareness and ability to observe their surroundings safely. The potential spalling impact on the gun and its recoil system further exacerbates the tank's impaired status and raises concerns about the reliability of its primary offensive capabilities.
Decision Making Justification:
Given the rating of 4 - Limited Functionality (LF), immediate action is required to address the critical damage sustained by the Leopard 2A4. Repairs will demand extensive resources and time, making it impractical during active combat. However, the tank's mobility and basic functionality may still be intact, allowing it to perform limited tasks. In this condition, the tank can be withdrawn from frontline combat and prioritized for repair and recovery efforts. The damaged optics, periscopes, and hatches must be restored to ensure the safety and operational capabilities of the crew. Additionally, thorough inspections and repairs to the gun and its recoil system are crucial to regain the tank's primary offensive capabilities and restore its combat effectiveness.
Leopard 2A4 stuck in trench
2023.06.16 - 47.5009°N 35.93206°E
During offensive operations a Leopard 2A4 got stuck trying to destroy or cross a trench. The tank is otherwise undamaged and the crew is working with shovels to free it.
.png?id=16997199280&thumbnail=0x150)
BDA Rating: 9 - Resilient Performance (RP)
Damage Description:
A Leopard 2A4 got stuck in a trench during a mission, but fortunately, it was quickly recovered with the help of a few shovels and manpower. There is no evidence of any damage sustained to the tracks or suspension during the recovery process. The recovery efforts were successful in bringing the tank back to its full mobility and operational state.
Overall Assessment:
The Leopard 2A4 tank is rated as 9 - Resilient Performance (RP). Despite getting stuck in a trench, the tank demonstrated its resilience by being quickly recovered without any observable damage to critical components. The rapid recovery allowed the tank to maintain its operational capabilities near its original performance level.
Decision Making Justification:
Given the rating of 9 - Resilient Performance (RP), the decision-making process should acknowledge the tank's quick recovery and lack of apparent damage. The tank can continue to be deployed confidently in missions, as it is still operating at its full capacity without any significant degradation in its combat capabilities.
Leopard 2A6 ramming Bradley from cleared path
2023.06.17
id="" vehicleStatus=""> While moving along a path cleared of mines a Bradley was destroyed blocking it. The Leopard 2A6 choose to ram it out of the way, instead of risking to leave the path in a minefield. A short exposure to the burning of the bradley does not post a risk to the Leopard.BDA Rating: 9 - Resilient Performance (RP)
Damage Description:
The Leopard 2A6 had to ram a burning Bradley out of the way to continue its mission. In the process, it drove through the fire caused by Bradley's fuel. Despite this intense and hazardous maneuver, the tank's performance remains resilient, with minimal damage sustained from the fire and the collision with the burning Bradley.
Overall Assessment:
The Leopard 2A6 tank is rated as 9 - Resilient Performance (RP). Despite the challenges faced during the mission, the tank continues to operate near its original capabilities. The minimal damage sustained during the collision and exposure to fire has not significantly impacted the tank's overall combat effectiveness. As a result, the Leopard 2A6 remains fully operational and capable of fulfilling its primary functions without compromise.
Decision Making Justification:
Given the rating of 9 - Resilient Performance (RP), the decision-making process should prioritize minor maintenance to address any potential issues caused by the collision and fire exposure. Routine checks and inspections can be conducted to ensure that the tank's performance remains optimal in subsequent missions. The assessment allows military commanders to confidently deploy the Leopard 2A6 in its current condition, considering its high operational capabilities and the fact that it sustained only minimal damage during the challenging and critical mission.
Leopard 2A6 Lancet targeting hull side from above
2023.06.22
A Leopard 2A6 is targeted by Lancet drone from a steep angle above. The lost signal makes it hard to discern where exactly it detonated, but it appears to detonate near the tanks rear on the right side. It is likely that the drone overshot the target, with an air detonation triggered by its proximity fuze.Would the hull have been struck there, it would have occurred over the tracks, where some of Leos batteries are located. Such a hit is unlikely to disable the tank.
BDA Rating: 9 - Resilient Performance (RP)
Damage Description:
A Leopard 2A6 was targeted by a Lancet drone from a steep angle above. The lost signal made it hard to discern where exactly the drone detonated, but it appears to have detonated near the tank's rear on the right side. The likelihood is that the drone missed the target, resulting in an air detonation triggered by its proximity fuze.
If the hull had been struck in that area, it might have occurred on the hull over the tracks, where some of Leopard 2A6's batteries are located. However, as no damage could be observed, it is evident that the tank's design and protective measures proved effective in resisting the drone strike, and the tank remained unharmed.
Overall Assessment:
Based on the lack of observed damage and the tank's continued operational capability, the Leopard 2A6 is rated as 9 - Resilient Performance (RP). The tank has sustained minimal or no damage, and its systems continue to operate near their original capabilities. Only minor maintenance, if any, is required for the tank to maintain optimal performance.
Decision Making Justification:
Given the rating of 9 - Resilient Performance (RP), the tank can be considered fully operational and suitable for deployment without the need for immediate repairs or recovery efforts. The tank's unharmed condition allows it to continue fulfilling its combat roles effectively.
However, routine inspections and maintenance should be conducted to ensure that all systems remain in optimal condition, and any potential hidden damage resulting from the drone strike can be promptly addressed. The tank's resilience in withstanding the drone strike highlights the effectiveness of its design and reinforces its value in combat situations.
Leopard 2A6 Lancet targeting turret roof gunner side
2023.06.17 - 47.47799°N 35.88713°E
A FVP drone targets the upper part of the Leos turret. The warhead is too small to penetrate the frontal turret armor, but it could potentially damage the gunner sight or harm the nearby infantry.BDA Rating: 9 - Resilient Performance (RP)
Damage Description:
The Leopard 2A6 tank was targeted by a FPV drone on the turret, specifically the gunner side. The warhead used in the attack was too small to penetrate the frontal turret armor, resulting in no critical damage to the main structure or primary systems of the tank.
However, there is a minor chance that the gunner sight might have been slightly damaged due to the explosion. Further inspection and testing are required to assess the extent of this potential damage. Additionally, nearby infantry could have suffered minor injuries or been affected by the blast, but no significant harm was reported.
Overall Assessment:
Based on the damage caused by the FPV drone strike, the Leopard 2A6 tank is rated as 9 - Resilient Performance (RP). The tank remains fully operational and near its original capabilities, with only a slight possibility of minor damage to the gunner sight. Its primary offensive and defensive systems, including the turret and critical components, are unaffected by the attack.
The tank's resilience in withstanding the drone strike demonstrates its robust design and superior protection, which allows it to maintain its high combat effectiveness on the battlefield. The potential minor damage to the gunner sight can be rectified with minimal maintenance, ensuring the tank's optimal performance during subsequent missions.
Decision Making Justification:
Given the rating of 9 - Resilient Performance (RP), the decision-making process should prioritize a thorough inspection of the gunner sight to assess any potential damage. If necessary, the damaged components should be promptly repaired or replaced to maintain the tank's optimal combat capabilities.
While the tank remains fully operational, it is essential to consider the safety of nearby infantry during future engagements. The use of FPV drones as a threat should be closely monitored, and additional countermeasures could be deployed to protect both the tank and nearby friendly forces.
Overall, the assessment confirms that the Leopard 2A6 tank can continue to perform its missions effectively, and its overall combat readiness is not compromised by the FPV drone strike.
Leopard 2A4 hit a Mine right side
2023.06.30
This Leopard 2A4 hit one or more mines, and was likely struck by drones or ATGMs afterwards. A broken road wheel can be seen in the foreground.The damage under the gun barrel and on the upper front plate indicates some kind of hit just below the turret neck. The right side of the rear turret and hull is also scorched, indicating some kind of fire or explosion occurred there, likely by another UAV or ATGM strike.
Repair to the engine and suspension is likely required, further assessment is not possible.
BDA Rating: 6 - Partial Usability (PU)
Damage Description:
- Mine Hit and Follow-up Attacks: The Leopard 2A4 tank hit one or more mines, which caused significant damage to the vehicle. The right side of the tank suffered severe impact, resulting in a ripped off and broken road wheel lying next to it. Additionally, damage under the gun barrel and on the upper front plate indicates some kind of hit just below the turret neck.
- UAV or ATGM Strikes: After the mine hit, the tank was likely targeted by drones or anti-tank guided missiles (ATGMs). The right side of the rear turret and hull shows signs of scorching, indicating some kind of fire or explosion occurred there. This damage was likely caused by another UAV or ATGM strike, further impairing the tank's functionality.
Overall Assessment:
The Leopard 2A4 tank is rated as 6 - Partial Usability (PU). While the tank remains partially usable, its effectiveness is significantly compromised due to the extensive damage sustained from the mine hit and subsequent attacks. The loss of a road wheel and the damage on the right side impairs the tank's mobility and stability during maneuvers, making it difficult to traverse uneven terrain and limiting its operational capabilities. Furthermore, the damage to the turret and hull caused by the UAV or ATGM strikes poses additional challenges to the tank's survivability and defensive capabilities, as well as affecting critical systems within the turret.
Despite these limitations, the tank's primary offensive capabilities, such as its main gun and main systems, may still be operational. However, the overall performance and effectiveness of the Leopard 2A4 are noticeably diminished, and it should be operated with caution in combat scenarios.
Decision Making Justification:
Given the rating of 6 - Partial Usability (PU), the decision-making process should prioritize immediate recovery efforts and repairs to restore mobility and functionality on the right side. The damage to the turret and hull should also be carefully assessed and repaired to ensure critical systems are fully operational. Once the necessary repairs are completed, the tank's deployment can be reconsidered for specific missions, considering the limitations imposed by the damage and the potential risks associated with its operational capabilities.
Leopard 2A6 tank shooting Russian trench with HE rounds
2023.06.30
Leopard 2A6 shooting Russian trench with HE at an unknown location.Leopard 2A6 hit by Krasnopol Artillery and Lancet Drone
2023.07.03 - 47.49527°N 35.90051°E
A 152mm HE Guided Artillery shell (Krasnopol) likely struck this Leopard 2A6 on the left side above the tracks on the upper front plate. The explosion forced one of the arrow head armor modules upwards and broke it out of its hinges. The tank itself remained in parts mobile and reversed some 15 meters into the side of the road seeking cover, where it was left.The artillery shell likely broke the left track, leaving the tank immobile after moving a short distance.
Directly above the track is an external fuel tank which was likely damaged and ignited by the impact. This external fuel fire caused the scorch marks we can observe in the images. The fire did not spread to the inside or to other parts of the tanks, as we could observe in the later drone footage.
.png?id=326523403&thumbnail=0x150)
_001.png?id=3369568280&thumbnail=0x150)
Analysis of the artillery strike.
While the tank was moving back and forth laying fire down south, it was observed and targeted by a russian drone, likely an Orlan type. The drone used a laser to guided a Krasnopol 152mm artillery shell down onto the Leopard 2A6 as it was slowly reversing. From the aftermath and the drone footage, we can conclude that the artillery shell impacted the external fuel over the idler wheel on the left side. The impact destroyed the track, fuel tank, and lifted the left wedge armor out of its hinges.
Analysis of the Lancet strike.
BDA Rating: 4 - Limited Functionality (LF)
Damage Description:
- Artillery Shell Impact: The Leopard 2A6 tank was likely struck by a 152mm HE Guided Artillery shell (Krasnopol) on the left side above the tracks, specifically on the upper front plate. The explosion forced one of the addon arrow head armor modules upwards and broke it out of its hinges. The tank itself remained in parts mobile and reversed some 15 meters into the side of the road seeking cover, where it was left.
- Track Damage: The impact likely broke the left track, leaving the tank immobile after moving a short distance. The track damage severely affects the tank's mobility, hindering its ability to move and maneuver effectively.
- External Fuel Tank: Directly above the track is an external fuel tank, which was likely damaged and ignited by the impact. The resulting external fuel fire caused the scorch marks observed in the images. Fortunately, the fire did not spread to the inside or other parts of the tank, as confirmed in later drone footage.
- Lancet Drone Strike: Subsequently, the tank was targeted by a Lancet drone on the roof above the gunner's seat. However, in later images, no new damage was observed, indicating that the tank's primary offensive capabilities were not severely impacted by the drone strike.
Overall Assessment:
Based on the damage caused by the artillery shell impact, track damage, and external fuel tank ignition, the Leopard 2A6 tank is rated as 4 - Limited Functionality (LF). The tank's performance is significantly reduced due to the broken track, rendering it immobile. The damaged external fuel tank might have caused damage to the surrounding structure and might need more extensive repairs. The absence of new damage from the Lancet drone strike ensures that the tank's primary offensive systems are still intact, allowing it to engage targets effectively once mobility is restored.
Decision Making Justification:
With a CDURS rating of 4 - Limited Functionality (LF), the priority in decision-making should be immediate recovery efforts and track repairs to restore mobility. Addressing the external fuel tank damage and ensuring proper safety measures are taken to prevent any fuel-related hazards is also crucial. Once the tank is fully mobile again, it can be deployed effectively with its primary offensive capabilities intact.
Leopard 2A6 Lancet targeting hull ammo rack
2023.07.06 - 47.50717°N 35.83078°E
A Lancet drone attempts to target the hull ammo rack of this Leopard 2A6, based on the trajectory and the footage cutting out early, we concluded that the drone likely struck the ground or detonated to early due to its proximity sensor. Analyzing later footage and Satellite images from this area - and the lack of russian footage of this tank - it is unlikely to have penetrated the armor and struck the hull ammunition. The damage likely remained to be minimal.BDA Rating: 9 - Resilient Performance (RP)
Damage Description:
A Leopard 2A6 was targeted 3082y a Lancet drone. Based on the trajectory of the drone and the footage cutting out early, we concluded that the drone likely struck the ground or detonated too early due to its proximity sensor. The drone is unlikely to have caused much damage, at most to the suspension on the track of the left side.
Overall Assessment:
Considering the limited damage caused by the Lancet drone strike, the Leopard 2A6 tank is rated as 9 - Resilient Performance (RP). The tank sustains minimal damage and continues to operate near its original capabilities. Only minor maintenance is required for optimal performance.
Decision Making Justification:
Given the rating of 9 - Resilient Performance (RP), the Leopard 2A6 can be deemed fully operational and deployable for future missions. The minimal damage to the suspension on the track of the left side can be easily addressed during routine maintenance without affecting the tank's overall combat capabilities significantly. There is no immediate need for recovery efforts or extensive repairs, and the tank can continue to contribute effectively to the mission.
The damage assessment ensures that military commanders can confidently utilize the Leopard 2A6 in its current condition, knowing that its operational capabilities are largely unaffected by the Lancet drone strike.
Leopard 2A4 hit a Mine left side
2023.07.18
Leopard 2A4 struck mines, ripping one of the road wheels out of its mount. With the damaged track, it reversed more than 20 meters.Will require repairs to the hull floor and suspension.
BDA Rating: 6 - Partial Usability (PU)
Damage Description:
- Mine Hit Damage: A Leopard 2A4 tank hit a mine on its left side. The explosion caused severe damage to the left side of the tank, particularly affecting the road wheels.
- Roadwheel Damage: Multiple road wheels on the left side were damaged due to the mine explosion. Additionally, one road wheel was completely ripped out of the hull, including its mount.
Overall Assessment:
Based on the damage caused by the mine explosion, the Leopard 2A4 tank is rated as 6 - Partial Usability (PU). While the tank remains partially usable, its effectiveness is limited due to the significant mobility loss on the left side. The damage to the road wheels and the complete loss of one road wheel affects the tank's ability to maneuver effectively, and will require repairs. However, the tank's primary offensive capabilities, including its main gun and turret systems, have not been directly impacted by the mine hit.
Decision Making Justification:
Given the rating of 6 - Partial Usability (PU), the decision-making process should prioritize immediate recovery efforts and repairs to restore mobility on the left side. The repair efforts should focus on replacing the damaged road wheels and repairing the hull mount for the missing road wheel. Restoring mobility is crucial for the tank to remain effective in combat scenarios. The damage to the main structure, such as the turret and critical systems, appears to be relatively limited, which is a positive aspect. However, monitoring and further inspection during repairs are necessary to ensure no hidden damage to vital components.
Leopard 2 was hit (low res)
2023.07.22 - 47.45822°N 35.88006°E
The extend of damage is unclear. It being absent from Satellite images suggest that the tank was never immobilized or quickly recovered.BDA Rating: 7 - Usable with Limitations (UL)
Damage Description:
A Leopard 2 tank was hit, but due to the lack of clear footage and information, it is uncertain what weapon was used and the exact extent of the damage sustained. The available footage shows the tank moving after the strike, suggesting that it may not be completely immobilized. However, without a comprehensive assessment, it is challenging to determine the full scope of the damage.
Overall Assessment:
Based on the limited information available, the Leopard 2 tank is provisionally rated as 7 - Usable with Limitations (UL). While the tank appears to be mobile, there may be hidden damage or impairments that are not immediately apparent. This could lead to limitations in certain features or systems that may affect the tank's operational capabilities. It is essential to conduct a thorough inspection and assessment to gain a better understanding of the damage and make an accurate determination of its usability and potential limitations.
Decision Making Justification:
Given the uncertain nature of the damage and the tank's current mobility, the decision-making process should prioritize a comprehensive inspection and assessment of the Leopard 2.
Leopard 2A4 hit Mines and hit by Lancet on the gun
2023.07.22 - 47.47003°N 35.85447°E
This Leopard 2A4 drover over at least two mines, possibly while reversing. Both tracks were lost together with the last road wheel on the left side. The lost tracks can not be seen nearby, so it is possible the tank was already dragged or pushed to this position.As the video was taken by a Leopard 2A6 driver, we could theorize that they assisted to tow the Leopard 2A4 here, and is now waiting for a recovery vehicle.
A lance drone also struck the tank afterwards, destroying the glass fiber fume extractor. The fume extractor can be easily replaced and does not impede the operation, the damage caused by the mines however likely requires repairs to the hull floor, suspension and torsion bars.
BDA Rating: 5 - Marginal Usability (MU)
Damage Description:
- Mine Hit Damage: A Leopard 2A4 drove over at least two mines, possibly while reversing. Both tracks were lost together with the last road wheel on the left side. The lost tracks cannot be seen nearby, so it is possible the tank was already dragged or pushed from the frontline to this position further in the rear. This damage severely affects the tank's mobility and renders it immobile.
- Lancet Drone Strike: On this position, a lance drone struck the tank, destroying the glass fiber fume extractor. The fume extractor can be easily replaced. Fortunately, the drone strike did not cause further critical damage to the tank's main structure and systems.
Overall Assessment:
Considering the damage caused by the mine hit and the Lancet drone strike, the Leopard 2A4 tank is rated as 5 - Marginal Usability (MU). While the tank remains partially usable, its effectiveness is severely limited due to the complete loss of both tracks and the last road wheel on the left side. The tank is currently immobile and unable to maneuver effectively, significantly hindering its operational capabilities. However, the tank's primary offensive capabilities, including its main gun and critical systems, have not been severely impacted by the drone strike. The damage is localized to the glass fiber fume extractor, which can be easily replaced, allowing the Leopard 2A4 to maintain its primary offensive abilities.
Decision Making Justification:
Given the rating of 5 - Marginal Usability (MU), the decision-making process should prioritize immediate recovery efforts to restore mobility. Recovering the tank from its current position and repairing or replacing the lost tracks and road wheel are essential for the tank to become operational again. Once mobility is restored, the Leopard 2A4 can be redeployed effectively, considering its primary offensive capabilities remain intact despite the damage from the drone strike. The replacement of the glass fiber fume extractor can be scheduled during routine maintenance without significantly affecting the tank's overall combat capabilities. However, the priority should be to address the mobility issues first, as an immobilized tank is vulnerable and unable to actively participate in combat scenarios.
Leopard 2A6 Lancet overshooting commander side
2023.07.22 - 47.45944°N 35.84846°E
A FPV drone attempts to target the roof of a Leopard 2A6, but it likely overshoots based on the trajectory, and the fact that the footage was cut early.BDA Rating: 10 - Unaffected
Damage Description:
A Leopard 2A6's roof was targeted by an FPV drone, but it likely overshoots based on the trajectory, and the fact that the footage was cut early to hide that it missed. As a result of the failed FPV drone strike, there is no damage observed on the tank's roof or any critical systems. The tank remains fully operational with no signs of degradation in its combat capabilities.
Overall Assessment:
Based on the damage description, the Leopard 2A6 tank is rated as 10 - Unaffected. The attempted FPV drone strike had no impact on the tank's functionality, and it continues to operate at its full capacity without any signs of damage or reduction in combat effectiveness.
Decision Making Justification:
Given the rating of 10 - Unaffected, no immediate repairs or recovery efforts are required for the Leopard 2A6. The tank can be deployed with full confidence in its capabilities to carry out its mission without any limitations due to damage.
Leopard 2A6 immobilized by Mine, hit twice by Lancet (smoke pods)
2023.07.23 - 47.49131°N 35.83841°E
id="" vehicleStatus=""> This Leopard 2A6 appeared on the Satellite images on Jul 19, so it was likely disabled there by a mine. A lancet drone again can be seen targeting the turret on the commander side where the smoke launchers are located. The turret has sufficient armor there to protect against Lancet strikes, as we can see from a similar incident.The cover on top of the batteries was also dented in.
.png?id=630977131&thumbnail=0x150)
.png?id=9749601399&thumbnail=0x150)
Analysis of the Lancet strike.
A total of 400 positions were reconstructed, from which we extrapolated the flightpath for the last missing couple of meters, to determine the impact location and angle.
You can see how the Lancet is diving from an altitude of 440 meters about ground (500m above the sea level) towards the tank. The primary attack angle seems to be similar to other Lancet strikes, with about 50° on average, and ~22° on the final approach (to horizontal).
.png?id=8405551570&thumbnail=0x150)
.png?id=12101302258&thumbnail=0x150)
In the 5th image, the damage is highlighted. In red, the cover of the battery compartment deformed by the blast. In green, a small chunk was chipped from an edge of the turrets armor.
BDA Rating: 6 - Partial Usability (PU)
Damage Description:
- Mine Hit Damage: The Leopard 2A6 hit a mine with its left track, resulting in immobilization. The force of the explosion severely damaged the left track, rendering the tank unable to move or maneuver effectively, significantly impacting its mobility during combat.
- Lancet Drone Strike (Turret): The subsequent Lancet drone strike targeted the right side of the tank's turret. The impact of the strike destroyed one of the turret's smoke launchers. Additionally, the explosion caused damage to the cover of the batteries in the hull. It is currently unclear if the batteries themselves were damaged. However, critical systems within the turret, as well as the main structure, remained intact, preserving the tank's primary offensive capabilities.
- Lancet Drone Strike (Missed): A second Lancet drone attempted to strike the tank but overshot, resulting in the detonation occurring above the right side without causing any damage to the tank. The tank's systems were unaffected, and it sustained no further damage from this attempted strike.
Overall Assessment:
Considering the damage caused by the mine hit and the Lancet drone strike, the Leopard 2A6 tank is rated as 6 - Partial Usability (PU). While the tank remains partially usable, its effectiveness is limited due to the immobilization resulting from the mine hit and the destruction of the smoke launcher on the turret. The damage to the batteries' cover raises concerns about potential electrical system issues, requiring further inspection to determine the full extent of the damage. However, the tank's primary offensive capabilities, including its main gun and primary turret systems, have not been severely impacted by the Lancet drone strikes. This allows the Leopard 2A6 to continue engaging targets effectively, albeit with reduced mobility and potential electrical system limitations.
Decision Making Justification:
Given the rating of 6 - Partial Usability (PU), the decision-making process should prioritize immediate recovery efforts and repairs to restore mobility by addressing the damage to the left track. Additionally, the damaged smoke launcher on the turret should be replaced or repaired to ensure the tank's defensive capabilities are fully operational. A thorough inspection of the batteries' condition is essential to assess any potential electrical system damage and address it promptly. The tank's ability to engage targets effectively remains intact, but it should avoid further risks until the necessary repairs are completed. With the appropriate repairs and maintenance, the Leopard 2A6 can be restored to a more functional state and continue its mission with improved combat capabilities.
Leopard 2A6 FPV drone hitting turret armor gunner side
2023.07.23 - 47.45803°N 35.85024°E
A FPV drone likely attempts to target the gunner optics, but instead strikes the turret armor on the gunners side.Damage is minimal and according to the crew did not even reach the main armor.
_002.png?id=9242619113&thumbnail=0x150)
BDA Rating: 9 - Resilient Performance (RP)
Damage Description:
A Leopard 2A6 tank was targeted by an FPV drone. The drone's trajectory indicated an attempt to target the gunner optics, but instead, it struck the turret armor close to the optics location.
On the side facing the impact, the optics are adequately armored, preventing any significant damage to the gunner's sight system. The drone strike managed to affect only non-critical components, leaving the tank's main structure and essential systems unaffected. As a result, the tank's primary offensive capabilities, defensive measures, and mobility remain intact.
Overall Assessment:
Considering the limited damage caused by the FPV drone strike, the Leopard 2A6 tank is rated as 9 - Resilient Performance (RP). The tank sustains minimal damage and continues to operate near its original capabilities. Only minor maintenance is required for optimal performance.
Decision Making Justification:
Given the rating of 9 - Resilient Performance (RP), the tank remains fully operational and combat-ready. The damage inflicted by the FPV drone strike is minor and easily reparable during routine maintenance without affecting the tank's overall combat capabilities.
The Leopard 2A6 can continue its mission without any immediate recovery efforts or major repairs. Its resilience in withstanding the drone strike showcases the effectiveness of its armor and design in combat scenarios.
However, it is advised to conduct a thorough inspection and verification of all systems to ensure no hidden damage or critical vulnerabilities exist before deploying the tank for further missions.
Leopard 2A6 hit mines
2023.07.24 - 47.48863°N 35.8379°E
This Leopard drove over a mine with the right track.Satellite images of the 13.08 show the the tank was recovered.
BDA Rating: 6 - Partial Usability (PU)
Damage Description:
A Leopard 2A6 tank drove over a mine with the right track on the way to the front and was immobilized. Detailed damage assessment couldn't be observed, but it can be inferred that the mine hit caused severe damage to the right side of the tank. The immobilization indicates that the track system and possibly other critical components on the right side have been affected.
Overall Assessment:
Given the mine hit and subsequent immobilization, the Leopard 2A6 tank is rated as 6 - Partial Usability (PU). The tank remains partially usable, but its effectiveness is significantly impacted due to the immobilization on the right side. The damage to the track system hampers the tank's mobility and maneuverability, limiting its operational capabilities in combat situations. However, without a detailed damage assessment, it is challenging to determine the full extent of the damage and whether other critical systems have been affected.
Decision Making Justification:
Considering the rating of 6 - Partial Usability (PU), the decision-making process should prioritize immediate recovery efforts and a comprehensive damage assessment. The immobilization issue needs to be addressed promptly to restore the tank's mobility and combat readiness. Once the tank is mobile, a detailed inspection can be conducted to identify all damaged components and plan for necessary repairs. The lack of detailed damage observation highlights the importance of a thorough examination to fully understand the tank's operational status and potential risks associated with its use in combat.
Leopard 2A6 in Trench, hit by Lancet and FAB bomb
2023.07.26 - 47.45068°N 35.84719°E
This Leopard 2A6 got stuck in a Trench just east of Robotyne directly at the line of contact. On the satellite image of the 25.07 the tank is not yet visible, it got stuck there on the 26.07 evident by the footage published that day. The same day it got targeted twice by Lancet drones..png?id=15496998629&thumbnail=0x150)
.png?id=16722004308&thumbnail=0x150)
.png?id=5369773740&thumbnail=0x150)
_001.png?id=797669522&thumbnail=0x150)
The tank was struck by a FAB bomb, resulting in it burning out.
Analysis of the strikes
The 2nd drone landed short and impact the ground near the front of the tank.
The last drone impacted the external storage bustle and set the food/cloth/equipment of the crew on fire.
Unlike previous flight path reconstructions, the footage of these drones were simply too low in quality and cutting out too early to fully reconstruct the scene. Instead we modeled a rougher estimation on how the events unfolded.
Analysis of the first Lancet strike.
Analysis of the second Lancet strike.
Analysis of the third Lancet strike.
BDA Rating: 2 - Non-functional (NF)
Damage Description:
- Trench Incident: The Leopard 2A6 became stuck in a trench just east of Robotyne, directly at the line of contact. This incident likely caused minor damage to the tank's undercarriage and possibly its tracks, but no significant structural damage was observed.
- Lancet Drone Strikes: On the same day, the tank was targeted twice by Lancet drones. One of the drones likely blew off one of the tank's road wheels. This damage further reduced the mobility of the vehicle.
- FAB Bomb Impact: Months later, the abandoned tank was hit by a FAB bomb about 6 meters off to its right side. The bomb caused the tank to burn out completely.
Overall Assessment:
Considering the damage caused by the trench incident, Lancet drone strikes, and the subsequent FAB bomb impact, the Leopard 2A6 tank is rated as 2 - Non-functional (NF). The tank has sustained severe damage, rendering it non-functional and irreparable. The combined effects of getting stuck in the trench, losing a road wheel to a drone strike, and burning out from the bomb impact have made the tank completely non-operational. Salvageable parts are minimal, if any.
Decision Making Justification:
Given the rating of 2 - Non-functional (NF), the decision-making process should prioritize the recovery the recover due to its proximity to the frontline, to prevent the enemy getting its hands on it.
Leopard 2A6 hit mines and struck by Lancet from behind
2023.07.27 - 47.4817°N 35.87072°E
This Leopard drove over a mine with the right track. On the right side the frontal road wheel was lost.
.png?id=2967787865&thumbnail=0x150)
_001.png?id=4946036466&thumbnail=0x150)
BDA Rating: 3 - Severely Impaired (SI)
Damage Description:
- Mine Hit Damage: The Leopard 2A6 hit mines with its right track while en route to the frontline, resulting in severe damage to the right side of the tank. The frontal road wheel broke off, and the mine impact caused the loss of a road wheel and damage to neighboring ones. The tank was immobilized due to the mine hit, rendering it unable to move or maneuver effectively.
- Lancet Drone Strike: A subsequent Lancet drone strike targeted the turret from behind, specifically on the loader's side. The impact damaged the smoke pods on the turret. Fortunately, the main structure of the turret and critical systems were not affected, indicating that the tank's primary offensive capabilities remain intact.
- Internal Fire: Low-resolution satellite images suggest that the tank may have experienced an internal fire, indicated by significant discoloration. This could potentially result in damage to internal components and systems, including critical electronics and the overall structural integrity of the tank.
- Ammunition Fire: Footage later revealed an ammunition fire in the turret bustle area. This fire likely destroyed nearby fire control electronics, further impacting the tank's combat capabilities. The fire spread downwards, scorching part of the engine bay and destroying the suspension.
Overall Assessment:
Taking into account the damage caused by the mine hit, the Lancet drone strike, internal fire, and ammunition fire, the Leopard 2A6 tank is rated as 3 - Severely Impaired (SI). The tank has suffered extensive damage, rendering critical systems non-functional and severely impacting its combat effectiveness. The loss of mobility, damage to road wheels, and compromised suspension significantly limit its maneuverability and stability. The internal fire and ammunition fire further exacerbate the damage, likely resulting in the destruction of key electronic components, systems, and structural integrity. While some offensive capabilities remain intact, the overall operational capability of the tank is substantially diminished.
Decision Making Justification:
Given the rating of 3 - Severely Impaired (SI), immediate recovery and repairs are essential to restore the tank's basic functionality. Addressing the damage to the road wheels, suspension, and internal components should be prioritized. Additionally, thorough inspection and restoration of the tank's structural integrity and electronic systems are necessary to mitigate the effects of the internal fire and ammunition fire. The tank's offensive capabilities may require extensive repairs, but if feasible, efforts should be made to restore them to a limited operational state. The assessment indicates that the tank can potentially be salvaged, albeit with significant resources and time investment.
Leopard 2A6 in combat under fire
2023.07.31
A Leopard 2A6 is engaging the enemy near Robotyne, when likely artillery or possible enemy fire lands in the trees on the right side.BDA Rating: 10 - Unaffected (UA)
Damage Description:
- Artillery Impact: While engaging hostiles, artillery impacts occurred about 10 meters from the right side of the tank, causing minor disturbances. Some wooden fragments from the nearby trees landed on the tank. However, the tank's main structure and critical systems remain completely unaffected by the artillery fire.
Overall Assessment:
The Leopard 2A6 tank is rated as 10 - Unaffected (UA) following the artillery impact. The tank's robust construction and advanced armor have successfully withstood the artillery fire. The minor disturbances and wooden fragments have not had any impact on the tank's overall functionality, mobility, or offensive capabilities. The tank can continue its mission without requiring any immediate repairs or recovery efforts.
Decision Making Justification:
With a CDURS rating of 10 - Unaffected (UA), the tank remains fully operational and capable of effectively engaging hostiles. No immediate action is required for recovery or repairs. Standard maintenance procedures can be conducted to address any minor cosmetic or superficial effects of the artillery impact. The Leopard 2A6 can continue its mission without compromise.
Leopard 2A4 hit mines
2023.08.02
This Leopard 2A4 drove over a mine with the rear of its left side.BDA Rating: 6 - Partial Usability (PU)
Damage Description:
- Mine Hit Damage: A Leopard 2A4 hit mines with its left track, likely while reversing or turning and was immobilized. The rear road wheel was damaged and the track thrown.
Overall Assessment:
Considering the damage caused by the mine hit, the Leopard 2A4 tank is rated as 6 - Partial Usability (PU). While the tank remains mostly unaffected, the mine strike immobilized it. Other critical components, including the suspension and engine are unaffected and remain fully operational.
Decision Making Justification:
Given the rating of 6 - Partial Usability (PU), the decision-making process should prioritize immediate recovery efforts and repairs to restore mobility on the left side. Once the tank is fully mobile and operational, it can continue to contribute effectively to the mission.
Leopard 2A6 interview - Damage by Artillery
2023.08.08
In an interview of a Leopard 2A6 by the 47th mechanized bridge, the crew shows damage they sustained by artillery strikes.Notable is the missing smoke launcher on the left side, in addition to fragmentation damage on the rear storage bins.
BDA Rating: 8 - Fully Usable (FU)
Damage Description:
- Smoke Launcher Damage: The Leopard 2A6 tank displays minor damage with a missing smoke launcher on the left side of the turret. While the smoke launcher is absent, it does not significantly impact the tank's operational capabilities. Smoke launchers are primarily used for defensive purposes, and their absence can be compensated by tactical adjustments.
- Fragmentation Damage: Some minor fragmentation damage is evident on the rear storage bins of the tank. This damage is likely a result of previous combat engagement. While it affects the aesthetics of the vehicle and the integrity of the storage area, it does not hinder the tank's primary functions.
Overall Assessment:
Based on the observed damage, the Leopard 2A6 tank is rated as 8 - Fully Usable (FU). The missing smoke launcher on the left side of the turret has a negligible impact on the tank's overall combat effectiveness. Similarly, the minor fragmentation damage to the rear storage bins does not compromise the tank's core operational capabilities. The tank remains fully operational, capable of performing all primary functions without any significant limitations. The crew can continue to operate the tank effectively in combat scenarios.
Decision Making Justification:
With a rating of 8 - Fully Usable (FU), no immediate repair or recovery efforts are necessary. The missing smoke launcher can be addressed during routine maintenance or replaced as needed. The fragmentation damage on the rear storage bins, being minor in nature, does not warrant immediate action and can also be managed during scheduled maintenance.
Leopard 2A4 tank shooting Russian positions
2023.08.18 - 47.5006°N 35.94257°E
This Leopard 2A4 tank of the 33rd Mechanized Brigade engages Russian positions (47.49071°N 35.95119°E).Two Leopard 2A6 shooting near Robotyne
2023.08.25
Ukrainian Leopard 2A4 tank works against an enemy position near the village of Robotyne in the Zaporizhzhia region, after which it sets up a smoke screenLeopard 2A6 damaged
2023.08.29
A Leopard 2A6 abandoned somewhere, likely with an ammunition fire in the turret bustle.
BDA Rating: 3 - Severely Impaired (SI)
Damage Description:
- Ammunition Explosion: From a low-resolution image, it is evident that the ammunition in the turret bustle likely burned, causing an explosion that activated the blowout panel and discolored the adjacent turret armor. This indicates a significant internal detonation, which can lead to severe damage to critical components within the turret.
- Potential Immobilization: While further damage cannot be observed from the available image, it is possible that the tank was immobilized.
Overall Assessment:
Based on the observed damage, the Leopard 2A6 tank is assessed as 3 - Severely Impaired (SI). The ammunition explosion in the turret bustle has likely caused significant internal damage, potentially compromising critical systems and rendering the tank non-operational. The discoloration of adjacent turret armor further supports the severity of the fire. Additionally, the possibility of immobilization indicates that the tank's mobility may have been affected, further contributing to its impaired status.
Decision Making Justification:
Given the rating of 3 - Severely Impaired (SI), immediate assessment and recovery efforts are essential. Specialized teams should be dispatched to evaluate the extent of internal damage, assess the potential for mobility restoration, and address safety concerns. Repairing the damage caused by the ammunition explosion will likely require extensive resources and time, making it impractical during active combat operations.
Leopard 2A4 (K1-ERA) lost its tracks
2023.09.02
A Leopard 2A4 equipped with additional K1 ERA, lost both its tracks and suffered from a fire on its right side near the engine compartment. The environment around the tank indicates that it was already pulled back and is now awaiting further processing.Leopard 2A4 and T-64BV targeted by Artillery and Lancet
2023.09.05
A Leopard 2A4 and a T-64BV were first attacked by a Lancet drone and then by a guided Krasnopol artillery round.BDA Rating: 6 - Partial Usability (PU)
Damage Description:
- Artillery Strike Damage: The Leopard 2A4 was targeted by a guided artillery shell, which impacted a few meters behind the tank. Unfortunately, it is not possible to observe the resulting damage directly.
Overall Assessment:
Due to the uncertainty regarding the extent of damage caused by the guided artillery shell, the Leopard 2A4 is rated as 6 - Partial Usability (PU). While there is no visible damage, it's essential to exercise caution and thoroughly inspect the tank for any hidden structural or system damage. Until a comprehensive assessment is conducted, the tank's usability remains limited, as the potential damage may impact its functionality.
Decision Making Justification:
Given the rating of 6 - Partial Usability (PU) and the lack of visible damage, the decision-making process should prioritize a thorough inspection and diagnostics of the Leopard 2A4. Special attention should be paid to critical systems and structural integrity. Once the assessment is complete and any necessary repairs or maintenance are performed, the tank's usability can be reassessed based on the actual damage incurred.
Leopard 2A4 recovered by Bergepanzer 3 Büffel
2023.09.05
> A Leopard 2A4 being recovered by a Bergepanzer 3 Büffel, with a missing right track. It's not certain if this is a new loss.BDA Rating: 6 - Partial Usability (PU)
Damage Description:
- Track Loss: The Leopard 2A4 tank has suffered a track loss on the right side. This severe damage significantly hinders the tank's mobility and maneuverability, making it immobile and in need of recovery.
- Turret Impact: There is a visible impact on the left turret armor. While the main structure of the turret appears intact, the armor has possibly sustained damage. It's unclear if this was caused by an ATGM or Drone.
Overall Assessment:
Given the damage to the track and the turret, the Leopard 2A4 tank is rated as 6 - Partial Usability (PU). The loss of the right track renders the tank immobile, limiting its operational capabilities. Additionally, the impact on the left turret armor may compromise its defense on that side.
Decision Making Justification:
Given the rating of 6 - Partial Usability (PU), the immediate focus should be on recovery and repair efforts. Restoring mobility by replacing the missing track is of paramount importance. Additionally, the turret armor should be assessed for possible repairs or reinforcement to ensure optimal defensive capabilities.
Two Leopard 2A6 shooting near Robotyne
2023.09.10
Two Leopard 2A6 working near RobotyneLeopard 2A6 shooting HE at extreme range
2023.09.14
A Leopard 2A6 is shooting HE directly at enemy positions from a range of >7km. The HE round can be seen flying for at least 6.9 seconds with ~1000m/s before the muzzle smoke obscures it.Unlike many assume this is not indirect fire, as the tank can directly observe the target on the horizon with 12x magnification.
Strv 122 immobilized and hit by Lancet
2023.09.22 - 49.457752°N 37.897468°E
This Strv 122 got immobilized duration offensive operations in the east near Stel'makhivka. The tank is abandoned in the field, the reason for it is unknown. There is no visible mine crater, or a dislodged track. The tank likely suffered from engine failure, unclear if from enemy fire or mechanical failure.A Lancet drone target the tank by approaching from the right rear, but overshoots and misses.
BDA Rating: 6 - Partial Usability (PU)
Damage Description:
- Immobilization: The Strv 122 tank was immobilized during offensive operations near Stel'makhivka in the east. The reason for immobilization is currently unknown. There are no visible signs of a mine crater or dislodged track. It is possible that the tank suffered from engine failure, although the exact cause, whether from enemy fire or mechanical failure, remains unclear.
- Lancet Drone Strike: Subsequently, a Lancet drone targeted the tank by approaching from the right rear. However, the drone overshot its mark and missed the tank. Fortunately, the tank's main structure and critical systems remain intact, and there is no visible damage caused by the drone strike.
Overall Assessment:
Considering the circumstances, the Strv 122 tank is rated as 6 - Partial Usability (PU). While the tank remains partially usable, its effectiveness is limited due to its immobilized state. The exact cause of immobilization, whether due to enemy fire or mechanical failure, needs to be investigated and resolved to restore the tank's mobility and operational capabilities. Fortunately, the Lancet drone strike did not result in any visible damage to the tank's structure or systems, which means that its primary offensive capabilities are intact.
Decision Making Justification:
Given the rating of 6 - Partial Usability (PU), the decision-making process should prioritize investigating and addressing the cause of immobilization. Once the issue is identified and resolved, the tank can be restored to full mobility and operational status. The lack of visible damage from the Lancet drone strike is a positive factor, as it means that the tank's combat capabilities can be fully retained.
Strv 122 immobilized and hit by Drones
2023.09.22 - 49.45775°N 37.89747°E
This Strv 122 got immobilized duration offensive operations in the east near Stel'makhivka. The tank is abandoned in the field, the reason for it is unknown. It appears the tank was hit while traveling (turret in travel position).A Lancet drone can be seen attacking the tank from the left front (right rear of the turret) targeting the roof between the commander hatch and the gunner optics. Due to the reinforced roof, it is unlikely that the drone penetrated the tank, however damage to the periscopes, or gunner sight are possible.
In the follow-up attack, two FPV drones target the tank. The first targets the reinforced roof in front of the loaders hatch. The second targets the turrets left side, being unclear where exactly it impacted
Swedish Armed Forces chief press officer says to me that they have not confirmed any losses of strv 122 in Ukraine, and cannot confirm any such losses.
A swedish volunteer reached out to their commander and was told the Lancet failed, and they got away.Cornucopia
A couple of days later (2023.10.04) Zelensky visits the Strv of the 21st mechanized that were hit by the drones.
Ukrainian Troops Recovered One Of Their Damaged Strv 122 Tanks—In Time For The Tank To Meet The President
_001.png?id=2682377010&thumbnail=0x150)
_001.png?id=8868754940&thumbnail=0x150)
BDA Rating: 5 - Marginal Usability (MU)
Damage Description:
- Mine Hit Damage: It appears that the tank hit a mine on its left side while traveling (turret in travel position). This indicates severe damage to the left side, potentially affecting the mobility and protection on that side.
- Lancet Drone Strike: A Lancet drone attacked the tank from the left front (right rear of the turret), targeting the roof between the commander hatch and the gunner optics. Due to the reinforced roof, it is unlikely that the drone penetrated the tank. However, damage to the periscopes or gunner sight is possible.
- FPV Drone Strikes: In the follow-up attack, two FPV drones targeted the tank. The first drone targeted the reinforced roof in front of the loader's hatch. The second drone targeted the turret's left side. The exact point of impact for the second drone is unclear.
Overall Assessment:
Based on the observed damage from the mine hit and the drone strikes, the Strv 122 tank is rated as 5 - Marginal Usability (MU). While the tank's basic functions are operational, its overall performance and effectiveness are noticeably diminished. The damage on the left side immobilized it, leaving it vulnerable to subsequent attacks. Additionally, potential damage to the periscopes or gunner sight may affect situational awareness.
Decision Making Justification:
Given the rating of 5 - Marginal Usability (MU), priority should be given to recovery efforts and repairs. Addressing the damage to the left side and assessing the functionality of the periscopes and gunner sight should be the primary focus. With timely repairs, the tank can be brought back to a more functional state for continued operational use.
Leopard 2A6 supporting Bradley IFVs in an attack
2023.09.29
Battle through the eyes of soldiers of the 47th separate mechanized brigade in the Melitopol direction.In this video, you can see the infantry under the reliable cover of our armor: the Bradley infantry fighting vehicle and the Leopard tank.
"During the offensive, tanks not only effectively destroy the enemy's infantry and their equipment, but also play the psychological role of "armor covers", - say the fighters of the 47th OMBr.
Leopard 2A6 appears near Avdiivka
2023.10.19
A Leopard 2A6, as it can be recognized by the long barrel, was spotted by a Russian drone support the defense near Avdiivka. While the footage is not interesting per se, it gives us the information that Ukraine moved some Leopard 2A6's of the 47th from Tokmak / Robotyne towards the east to assist repelling Russia's mechanized breakthrough attempts.Interesting is that in the same month, the 47th was pulled back to train in the rear and some Leopard 2A6 tanks were send for repairs to Lithuania. It is possible that their training was cut short and that they were again mobilized as a reserve to assist in Avdiivka.
Some sources suggest that they were actually send to the calm front of Avdiivka to take a break from their offensive actions, not knowing that Russia was planning offensive actions there.
Other elements of the 47th appeared as well, showing Bradley's assaulting a Russian position at 48.2129030245, 37.7043555863: Twitter.
Leopard 2A4 bustle ammunition fire - FPV drone (Nr.1)
2023.10.24 - 47.44141°N 35.81838°E
During offensive operations south of Robotyne Leopard 2A4s with K1 ERA were spotted at 47.43521°N 35.84207°E. The tanks was hit by an FPV drone with RPG 7 warheads in the turret bustle, resulting in an ammunition fire and a blowout.These tanks belong to the 33rd mechanized brigade. The drone belongs to the BOBRMORF group, which is operating near Robotyne for a while.
The footage shows the tank just firing its main gun 3 seconds before the drone hits. This is a cause for concern as the loader might just be grabbing another round - opening the blast door. As of yet we can not fully determine if all of the crew survived, or the loader or possibly other member of the turret crew were injured or killed.
An indicator that the outcome was good is that none of the hatches, or the gun shows any kind of smoke of pressure coming out of them - meaning that the explosion did not propagate through the tank. At 2:20 one crew men can be seen jumping of the front of the tank and running to the left, and at 2:33 another might be visible on the turret.
BDA Rating: 3 - Severely Impaired (SI)
Damage Description:
- FPV Drone Impact: The Leopard 2A4, equipped with additional ERA, sustained a direct hit from an FPV drone. The impact occurred from behind, striking the turret bustle. This resulted in a catastrophic chain of events, leading to an ammunition fire and a blowout. Fortunately, the fire was contained to the turret's rear section and was swiftly extinguished.
- Ammunition Fire and Blowout: The FPV drone strike triggered an ammunition fire within the turret. This fire, coupled with the subsequent blowout, resulted in significant damage to the turret and rear section of the vehicle. The crew's prompt action in evacuating likely prevented further harm.
Overall Assessment:
Considering the extent of damage caused by the FPV drone strike, the Leopard 2A4 is rated as 3 - Severely Impaired (SI). The equipment has suffered significant damage, with critical functions rendered unusable. Repairs would demand extensive resources and time, making field restoration impractical during active combat operations. The vehicle's mobility, offensive capabilities, and crew protection are severely compromised.
Decision Making Justification:
Given the rating of 3 - Severely Impaired (SI), immediate recovery efforts should be prioritized. The damaged Leopard 2A4 requires extensive repairs, potentially beyond what can be achieved in the field during active combat. Once removed from immediate danger, a thorough assessment and logistical planning for repairs should commence. This assessment reaffirms the critical importance of maintaining vigilant situational awareness and implementing defensive measures to mitigate the risk of FPV drone strikes in future operations.
Two Leopard 2A4 - bustle ammunition fire - FPV drone (Nr.2)
2023.10.24 - 47.44029°N 35.81824°E
A second Leopard 2A4 operated by the 33rd mechanized brigade was hit was hit twice by FPV drones, resulting in the vehicle from suffering from an ammunition blowout in the turret bustle. The vehicle was likely abandoned before the fire occurred.
.jpg?id=18071814023&thumbnail=0x150)
BDA Rating: 2 - Non-functional (NF)
Damage Description:
- FPV Drone Strike: The Leopard 2A4 was struck by an FPV drone from behind on top of the turret. Unfortunately, due to the nature of the strike, we are unable to directly observe the extent of the damage caused by this attack.
- Ammunition Fire and Blowout: Subsequently, another unidentified attack struck the tank, leading to an ammunition fire and a blowout.
- Frontal Damage and Burnout: Aftermath images reveal that the entire front of the tank has been burned out as a result of the preceding events.
Overall Assessment:
Based on the damage inflicted by the FPV drone strike, the subsequent ammunition fire, blowout, and resulting burnout, the Leopard 2A4 is rated as 2 - Non-functional (NF). The combined effects of these events have rendered the tank non-functional. It is severely damaged, with critical systems compromised. Repairs in the field are not feasible.
Decision Making Justification:
Given the rating of 2 - Non-functional (NF), immediate recovery efforts should be prioritized. Attempting to restore functionality is not viable due to the extensive and severe damage sustained. The tank should be transported to a dedicated maintenance facility to be salvaged for parts.
Leopard 2A4 hydraulics fire - FPV drone
2023.10.25 - 47.44407°N 35.84842°E
A Leopard 2A4, equipped with K1 ERA was hit by an FPV drone with an RPG 7 warhead on the right turret rear. The compartment that was hit contains the hydraulic pumps for the turret drives, the liquid being highly flammable resulted in a fire. How quickly it spread is unclear, however it can be observed to have spread to the crew compartment, evident by the flames coming out of the commander hatch.The fire probably spread relative slowly, giving the crew plenty time to bail.
BDA Rating: 3 - Severely Impaired (SI)
Damage Description:
- Attack Details: A Leopard 2A4, equipped with K1 ERA, was hit by an FPV drone carrying an RPG 7 warhead on the right turret rear. The compartment that was hit contains the hydraulic pumps for the turret drives. The liquid being highly flammable resulted in a fire.
- Fire Spread: The speed at which the fire spread is unclear; however, it is evident that it reached the crew compartment. Flames were observed emanating from the commander's hatch, indicating significant damage within the crew space.
Overall Assessment:
The Leopard 2A4 tank equipped with K1 ERA is rated as 3 - Severely Impaired (SI). The RPG strike on the right turret rear caused damage to the hydraulic pumps compartment, igniting a fire. The fire spread to the crew compartment, indicating severe damage. While some critical functions may be impacted, the tank is not completely irreparable but requires extensive resources and time for restoration.
Decision Making Justification:
Given the rating of 3 - Severely Impaired (SI), the tank requires immediate action to address the damage. Evacuation of the crew is essential, followed by fire suppression and damage control. Extensive repairs will be necessary, focusing on the turret and possibly the crew compartment. Depending on the extent of internal damage, a cost-benefit analysis may be needed to decide whether to repair or replace the affected systems.
Strv 122 hit by ATGM, turret bustle fire
2023.10.30 - 49.70142°N 37.86775°E
A Strv 122 was hit by an ATGM from the left side, in the ammunition bunker of the turret. This resulted in an ammunition fire. All four crew members bailed, seemingly unharmed..png?id=8930567951&thumbnail=0x150)
BDA Rating: 4 - Limited Functionality (LF)
Damage Description:
- ATGM Strike and Ammunition Fire: The Strv 122 was hit by an Anti-Tank Guided Missile (ATGM) from the left side, striking the ammunition bunker in the turret. This resulted in an ammunition fire, likely causing significant damage to the internal components of the turret.
- Crew Egress: All four crew members successfully bailed out of the tank, seemingly unharmed. This indicates that the crew managed to evacuate safely despite the ammunition fire, suggesting the damage was contained within the turret.
- FPV Drone Targeting: Another video footage shows a First-Person View (FPV) drone targeting the tank. While the extent of damage caused by the drone is unclear, it adds to the overall assessment of the tank's condition and potential vulnerabilities.
Overall Assessment:
While not fully certain, the damage depicted by the ATGM strike and ammunition fire indicates significant impairment to the Strv 122's functionality. The tank's critical systems, especially those within the turret, are likely compromised, affecting its combat capabilities. However, the successful evacuation of the crew suggests that the damage may not have extended beyond the turret, preserving the overall integrity of the tank's chassis and propulsion systems.
Decision Making Justification:
With a CDURS rating of 4 - Limited Functionality (LF), immediate attention should be given to assessing and repairing the damage caused by the ATGM strike and ammunition fire. Priority should be placed on restoring the functionality of the turret and ensuring the safety of future crew operations. The decision to send the tank to Lithuania for repairs aligns with the need for comprehensive maintenance and restoration of combat capability.
Leopard 2A6 fuel fire
2023.10.31 - 48.19062°N 37.69505°E
Vers. Nr. 2550-12-349-5239 Ind. 2366347 000000.000.0 Manufacturer: Krauss-Maffei-Wegmann Nr. 20354 1983 Type: Leopard 2A5 Max Total Weight: 60500 kg
Contrary to rumors suggesting the tank was hit by a T-72, Russian drone operators have explicitly stated that an RPG struck the tank, while urging the infantry to target it once more.
_002.png?id=11785975835&thumbnail=0x150)
Due to the winter setting in, resulting in dense cloud coverage, satellite image are not available.
The tank has not yet been recovered.
_002.png?id=2222863302&thumbnail=0x150)
BDA Rating: 4 - Limited Functionality (LF)
Damage Description:
- Fuel Fire Damage: This Leopard 2A6 of the 47th was struck by an RPG and suffered from a fuel fire in the engine bay. The burning fuel spread on the ground below the tank, potentially causing damage to other components located on the hull floor. Currently, we do not know if they could be contained, but it is likely that it at least spread to the left suspension and tracks.
- Aftermath Assessment: An Aftermath image shows that the fire did not spread further, and it only caused limited damage to the engine and suspension on the left side.
Overall Assessment:
Given the extent of the damage caused by the fuel fire, this Leopard 2A6 is rated as 4 - Limited Functionality (LF). While the tank's performance is significantly reduced, some essential functions may still be operational. Repairs may be possible with adequate resources and downtime. It's crucial to address the damage to the engine and suspension promptly to restore the tank's operational capabilities.
Decision Making Justification:
Given the rating of 4 - Limited Functionality (LF), the decision-making process should prioritize immediate repair efforts on the engine and suspension, focusing on the left side. Once these components are restored, the tank should regain some of its operational capabilities, albeit with reduced performance. Additional assessments may be needed to ensure no hidden damage exists in other components on the hull floor.
.jpg?id=9792868883&thumbnail=0x150)
Analysis of the autocannon fire.
Russian serviceman describes the main weaknesses of the Leopard 2 tank Its inability to be repaired in the field and excessive automation are the main drawbacks of a German Leopard 2A5 tank evacuated from the Avdiivka section of the Donbas front, commander of a repair platoon in the Central Military District under call sign Pero [lit. Plume] told Sputnik. "In my opinion, the main disadvantage of this pattern is to give electronic components, electronic parts, more opportunity for control than humans," the repair platoon commander explained. According to the serviceman, if the electronics are damaged on the front line, then the tank cannot be repaired immediately.
Additional images of the Leopard 2A6 in Moscow after it was captured can be found here. Leopard 2A4 between M113
2023.11.01 - 47.44418°N 35.84859°E
>Leopard 2A6 decoy
2023.11.01
Leopard 2A6 in combat
2023.11.11 - 48.19441°N 37.68215°E
Leopard 2A6 and a Bradley are fighting against Russians northern Avdiivka, before deploying smoke and falling back.Strv 122 in comba
2023.11.22
Strv 122 in combat near Synkivka.Strv 122 close range combat
2023 Fall - 49.76657°N 37.73944°E
Strv 122 in combat, engaging Russia infantry at extremely close range.Interview with Mykola Salamakh
2023.11.27
Interview Summary
And we have already seen quite a few instances where Leopard 2A6 crews engage in combat with even two enemy tanks and emerge victorious.
Categories of Leopard Tanks
- Leopard 2A4
- Received from Norway and other countries.
- 1985 model includes a thermal imager that still works today.
- Despite fears, Leopard 2A4 is well-protected, using British technology instead of explosive reactive armor.
- Leopard 2A6
- Modernized version of Leopard 2A5 and 2A4.
- Improved command control and commander’s thermal imaging capabilities.
- Enhanced modular armor protection, proving effective in combat.
Leopard 2A4 Performance in Combat
- Example: Brigade faced a T-62 tank ambush.
- Leopard 2A4 tanks withstood multiple hits from 115-mm APFSDS shells at 800 meters.
- Electronics and crew protection:
- Systems are mechanically duplicated for reliability.
- High-quality optics in backup sights.
- Track durability:
- Tracks with rubber pads withstand multiple mine explosions (e.g., TM-62).
Causes of Armored Vehicle Losses
- Most losses due to artillery, followed by aviation and drones.
- Anti-tank weapons account for less than 10% of total losses.
- FPV drones currently pose a minor threat, around 5% but growing.
Leopard 2 Repair Process
- Repair is a complex process involving:
- Replacement of gun barrels by tank crews themselves using a crane.
- Preparation of repair units alongside tank crews.
- Field repairs for minor damages (e.g., track, roller, torsion bar replacements).
- More extensive repairs conducted at rear brigade locations.
- If there is significant damage (e.g., armor penetration or fire exposure), the manufacturer or its representative must assess whether the vehicle is repairable or should be decommissioned or repurposed.
- Vehicles with major damage are sent to partner territories for specialist evaluation and repair.
- Western repair standards ensure ample spare parts and resources, avoiding delays.
- Burned-out vehicles can sometimes be salvaged if critical components, like turrets, are replaced.
Operational Differences in Leopard Tanks
- Repairs are consistent regardless of the country of origin (Canada, Portugal, Spain).
- Swedish Leopard tanks, similar to Leopard 2A5, are equipped with identical systems developed and manufactured by Germans or under German license.
Protection Against FPV Drones
- Currently developing net-based protections for rear turret areas vulnerable to FPV drone attacks.
- Dynamic protection is unfeasible due to the thin armor in these areas, affecting turret balance.
Use of Programmable Ammunition
- To use programmable ammunition, a programmer must be installed, which requires time and resources.
- Leopard 2A6 tanks may already be equipped to use these munitions, and additional tanks can be upgraded as needed.
Armor-Piercing Ammunition
- Western-supplied armor-piercing rounds can defeat all armored targets within the effective range of Leopard 2A4's guns (3.5-4 kilometers).
- Ukraine has received advanced German DM53 armor-piercing rounds.
Western Tank Weight and Usage
- Weight Comparison:
- Western tanks weigh around 60 tons compared to Soviet-era 45-ton tanks.
- Usage Considerations:
- Not used in areas with numerous water obstacles requiring extensive bridge-building or reinforcement.
- Transportation:
- Soviet-era tank trailers and transport vehicles can be used, though some Western haulers and trailers have been provided.
Performance on Donbas Terrain
- Western tanks are designed to operate in diverse conditions, from Arctic to equatorial regions.
- Issues with Soviet Tanks:
- T-72 tanks often shed tracks in muddy conditions due to wide rollers that accumulate mud.
- T-64 tanks fare better with narrower rollers that clear mud more effectively.
- T-64s have been used to tow stuck T-72 and T-80B tanks.
- Western Tanks:
- No significant issues observed with Challenger and Leopard 2 tanks.
- Automatic transmissions adjust to terrain, reducing driver errors.
Abrams Tanks in Ukraine
- Abrams tanks have arrived in Ukraine and are assigned to a brigade, though details are undisclosed for security reasons.
Leopard 2A4 targeted by FPV drone
2023.11.30 - 47.44336°N 35.8354°E
A Leopard 2A4 was targeted by an FPV drone on its front left as its returning from a combat operation. Analyzing the trajectory of the drone, we conclude that the drone likely impacted the front left side skirt of the tank, posing little risk of damaging it. This can be indirectly reinforced by the lack of aftermath footage of the tank being disabled - both by the russians and satellite imagery.BDA Rating: 8 - Fully Usable (FU)
Damage Description:
- FPV Drone Impact: The Leopard 2A4 was targeted by an FPV drone on its front left side while returning from a combat operation. Analysis of the drone's trajectory indicates that it likely impacted the front left side skirt of the tank. The assessment suggests minimal risk of significant damage to the tank.
- Evidence: The lack of aftermath footage depicting the tank's disablement from both Russian sources and satellite imagery indirectly reinforces the assessment. The absence of visible damage in recorded or satellite imagery suggests that the drone impact posed little risk of impairing the tank's functionality.
Overall Assessment:
Based on the analysis of the FPV drone impact and the lack of substantial evidence showing damage, the Leopard 2A4 is rated as 8 - Fully Usable (FU). The assessment indicates that the drone's impact on the front left side skirt did not compromise the tank's operational capabilities. There's no significant evidence to suggest impairment of the tank's primary functions.
Decision Making Justification:
With a rating of 8 - Fully Usable (FU), immediate repairs or recovery efforts are likely unnecessary, as the tank appears fully operational. However, routine checks and maintenance can be conducted to ensure the absence of any hidden damage or minor issues resulting from the drone impact. The tank can continue its operations without immediate concern for its combat capabilities.
Leopard 2A4 next to M113
2023.10.28 - 47.43834°N 35.81739°E
This Leopard 2A4 was hit multiple times by FPV drones from the front and back.Leopard 2A4 hit by ATGM and FPV Drone
2023.11.30 - 47.44305°N 35.80956°E
An abandoned Leopard 2A4 was hit on the frontline west of Robotyne by an FPV drone, and afterwards by at least two ATGMS.The exact extend of the damage, or why the tank was abandoned there in the first place is currently unclear. We can only note that no fuel or ammunition fire was shown in the video, as the video was cut short.
Twitter@trotes936897
However, this tank being a decoy is unlikely considering its location and proximity to the frontline.
Generally decoy vehicles lack their own propulsion, and considering the proximity in view of russian ATMGs crews, its unlikely that one would risk transporting a decoy to this location. The risk is simply too high, for little return.
Leopard 2A4 send for repairs in Poland
2023.12.05
More Leopard tanks from 🇵🇱 have arrived at the service hub in Bumar. Now the company's staff will assess their technical condition and repair work will begin.
Leopard 2A6 finishing abandoned tanks
2023.12.05
47th released footage showing the destruction of Russian tanks NE of Avdiivka.Two Leopard 2A6 returning from repairs
2023.12.15
The first Leopard 2 tanks repaired in Lithuania are gearing up for their journey to Ukraine! Having arrived from the frontline, these tanks are now ready to make an impactful return. 🇱🇹 DefMin @a_anusauskas praised @LTU_Army & German defense industry for outstanding work.
Leopard damage logs
2023.12.15
A list appeared that lists damages that occurred on the Leopard tanks, both durning battle and maintenance related.| Vehicle | Date | Note |
|---|---|---|
| Leopard 2A5 | 2023.11.05 | electronics repair |
| Leopard 2A6 | 2023.11.07 | suspension arm issues |
| Leopard 2A6 | 2023.11.07 | new engine starter needed |
| Leopard 2A6 | 2023.11.07 | 6 tanks are send back for repairs |
| Leopard 2A6 | 2023.11.07 | artillery hit |
| Leopard 2A6 | 2023.09.30 | artillery hit |
| Leopard 2A6 | 2023.09.30 | artillery hit, mine damage |
| Leopard 2A5 | 2023.09.30 | chassis repair |
| Leopard 2A5 | 2023.09.30 | artillery hit |
| Leopard 2A5 | 2023.10.05 | gun disabled - two ATGM hits |
| Leopard 2A5 | 2023.09.30 | road wheel, computers, compander periscope repaired |
| Leopard 2A5 | 2023.09.30 | damaged - ATGM hits |
| Leopard 2A5 | 2023.09.30 | onboard computer not working |
| Leopard 2A6 | 2023.11.13 | damaged - ATGM hits |
| Leopard 2A6 | 2023.10.31 | Training |
| Leopard 2A6 | 2023.11.13 | Training |
| Leopard 2A6 | 2023.10.05 | Training |
| Leopard 2A6 | 2023.10.05 | Training |
| Leopard 2A6 | 2023.11.16 | Gearbox leaking lubricant |
| Leopard 2A6 | 2023.11.16 | road wheels and stabilizer needs replacement |
| Leopard 2A6 | 2023.11.24 | ATGM hit - gunner sight needs replacement - fix holes. Replace rubber pads on tracks |
| Leopard 2A6 | 2023.11.24 | requires replacement of the suspension arm, rollers and rubber inserts in the tracks |
| Leopard 2A6 | 2023.11.24 | commander peri not working - road wheels and rubber pads need replacement |
| Leopard 2A6 | 2023.11.24 | large oil leak |
| Leopard 2A6 | 2023.11.24 | requires replacement of the suspension arm and rollers |
| Leopard 2A6 | 2023.11.27 | crashed into Bradley, the track flew off, hit the tensioner and fell of the roller and the tensioning mechanism itself need to be replaced. Replace rollers and rubber pads on the tracks. It is located 2 km from the enemy |
| Leopard 2A6 | 2023.11.27 | artillery hit - turret stopped working. Rollers and rubber pads on the tracks need to be replaced |
| Leopard 2A5 | 2023.10.05 | Main gun damaged by artillery |
| Leopard 1A5 | 2023.10.05 | additional equipment |
| Leopard 1A5 | 2023.10.05 | additional equipment |
| Leopard 1A5 | 2023.11.20 | stuck fuel valve, wear on the rubber rollers (3x), oil seals for the rollers (4x), gun issues - recoil is at critical level - oil leak |
| Leopard 1A5 | 2023.11.20 | roller nr.6 (critical) is leaking oil on the right side. Worn rubber (4x) ,6 |
| Leopard 1A5 | 2023.11.20 | smoke in the tower while operating the FCS - parking brake not working. Rubber is worn (6x) |
| Leopard 1A5 | 2023.11.20 | parking brake does not work. Rubber needs replacement (4x), hood lock not working |
| Leopard 1A5 | 2023.11.20 | worn rubber on rollers. Vertical stabilization not working, gun needs to be adjusted, gas extractor not working correctly, drivers night sight missing cable |
| Leopard 1A5 | 2023.11.20 | smoke in the tower while operating the FCS |
| Leopard 1A5 | 2023.11.20 | FCS failed - need to check coolant leak. |
| Leopard 1A5 | 2023.11.26 | damaged by drones |
| Leopard 1A5 | 2023.11.22 | damaged by drones |
| Leopard 1A5 | 2023.11.21 | damaged by drones |
Spare parts - Fit for war?
2023.12.15
German Leopard tanks not fit for the war? German tanks were made for exercises and parades, and not for real combat operations, reports Spiegel. A commission from Germany, which visited a repair center in Lithuania for German tanks, was unpleasantly surprised by the number of equipment that failed due to internal defects. Spiegel notes that problems persist with logistics and lack of spare parts - even in Lithuania, far from the front, mechanics encounter problems while repairing German Leopards. According to a Bundeswehr officer, German tanks wear out too quickly in combat conditions. Ukrainian military notes that the Leopard has fragile tracks - weakening their tension leads to breakdowns.
I was also there when I visited the workshop: there were no complaints about a lack of spare parts or personnel. When asked repeatedly about the damage, those responsible were even impressed by the robustness of the vehicles.
Rheinmetall told DER SPIEGEL that a comprehensive spare parts package for the Leopard 2A6 MBTs was ordered in December 2023, which was financed by Germany. A contract has also been signed between the maintenance centre operated by Rheinmetall and KMW and the Ukrainian Ministry of Defence to improve the supply of spare parts in both Ukraine and Lithuania.
However, the most important point that speaks against the "broken-down tank theory" is the fact that some of the tanks that are currently not operational are in the repair shops of the industry due to battle damage. in the repair shops of the industry. This distinguishes Western technology from many Soviet-designed combat vehicles. Western-made tanks that are hit - as many pictures and videos on the internet show - are damaged but not destroyed, as is often the case with Russian systems.
Leopard 2A6 hit by FPVs (open bustle)
2023.12.16 - 49.09274°N 38.02239°E
This Leopard 2A6 was immobilized somewhere near Kreminna. Shown are two drones targeting the already empty turret bustle. The second drone impacts on the smoke launchers, setting them off, creating a smoke cloud. It is unlikely the drones caused additional damage.However it is unclear what caused the initial immobilization or damage to the bustle.
BDA Rating: 4 - Limited Functionality (LF)
Damage Description:
- Immobilization and Bustle Damage: The Leopard 2A6 was immobilized, with visible damage to the turret bustle. Two drones were observed targeting the already empty turret bustle, with the second drone impacting the smoke launchers, setting them off and creating a smoke cloud. It appears that the drones did not cause additional damage beyond triggering the smoke launchers. However, the initial cause of immobilization or the specific damage to the bustle remains unclear.
Overall Assessment:
Based on the observed damage to the turret bustle and the resulting immobilization of the Leopard 2A6, the vehicle is rated as 4 - Limited Functionality (LF). The primary concern lies with the damage to the bustle, affecting the tank's functionality and potentially limiting its operational capabilities. While the specific cause of the initial immobilization remains unknown, the damage to the bustle warrants a rating of Limited Functionality.
Decision Making Justification:
With a rating of 4 - Limited Functionality (LF), immediate attention should focus on assessing and repairing the damage to the turret bustle. Restoration of the affected area is crucial to regain full operational functionality. Identifying the root cause of the immobilization is also paramount to prevent future incidents and ensure the Leopard 2A6's readiness for future operations.
Strv 122 smoking
2023.12.22 - 49.09726°N 37.98184°E
This Strv 122 is immobilized and smoking on its left rear.
Leopard 2A6 after ATGM hit
2023.12.26
According to the crew, this Leopard 2A6 was hit by an ATGM on the turret, gunner side. The ATGM did not penetrate, but caused a temporary power outage.
Column Strv 122 - FPVs
2024.01.02 - 49.09342°N 37.94782°E
This column of Strv 122s was targeted by FPVs and ATGMs. They were at least 5 hits.Leopard 2A6 - Two FPVs
2024.01.05
This Leopard 2A6 attacked by Two FPV dronesIts hard to say if this tank was hit or received any damage.
Leopard 2A6 - Three FPVs
2024.01.10 - 49.09145°N 38.02903°E
This Leopard 2A6/Strv 122 was targeted by at least 3 FPV drones.Its hard to say if this tank was hit or received any damage.
Leopard 2A6 - Repair required
2024.01.18
German n-tv reporters at a frontline field service point.Stranded in a forest, these Leopard 2A6 tanks are for recovery. The traces of war can not be overlooked, the cannon covered in shrapnel hits, the road wheels completely worn. Commander Roman and his crew came under fire at the front.
"As you can see the 120mm grenade impacted back here and damage the radiator, but without problems we could reach our position. The german armor really saved us and the crew wasn't harmed, but now the tank can only be repair at a factory."
The factory however is in Lithuania and the way there is long and difficult. Roman and his crew now need to prepare the tank for transport, cleaning it up and removing damaged parts. They will have to spend a long time without their tank.
"It would be much better if we could repair everything here in Ukraine. This alone would us allow to skip all documents needed for the border checkpoints. If we had everything here - the spare parts - we would not just save days and weeks, but months."
How important that is can be seen on the damaged tanks. For the first time reporters were allowed to film at such a service point this close to the front. It's a rare and honest view at the highly modern german battle tanks after months of operation in a war. "Over 70 Leopard 2 tanks were received by Ukraine by the West. How many of those are still operational? Thats a highly guarded military secret. In this unit out of 4 tanks only one remains operational. Others such as these here, are either damaged by compare, or have technical issues [tear and wear]." Ukraine crews are only allowed to do basic maintenance tasks. Changing filters, or checking the tracks. At the very least tools for this were delivered by Germany.
"We are tensioning the tracks - with enough experience you can tell when its enough."
Despite the long times for repairs, Roman loves his german tank. Faster, greater gun range, better fire control system. Despite that, the 35 year old commander has improvement suggestions. The armor could be more effective and more modern, we need new defensive systems [likely referring to drone or APS systems], as during the war new anti tank weapons were developed and we have to react to that. The war might not have been decided by the Leopard 2 - but Roman and his crew never wants to sit in a different tank.
Strv 122 - FPV (RPG) turret front
2024.01.10 - 49.08209°N 37.99654°E
This Strv 122 was targeted by an FPV drone with a normal RPG warhead. As the drone impacted on the frontal turret armor near the gunner sight, it is unlikely that the armor for perforated. However it is likely that the gunner sight was damaged in the process
Leopard 2A4 stuck in bomb crater
2024.01.16 - 47.88966°N 37.41917°E
A Leopard 2A4 got stuck in a bomb crater and was abandoned.
A new picture shows the tank with additional damage - possibly hit by multiple FPV drones on the left turret side and the hull - or artillery.
Worth highlighting is the sideskirt that was cut near the engine, and the bolts on the roadwheels that where loosened. It is likely that the tank was assessed, and salvaged for parts. Oddly it seems that other parts like ERA were left behind - usually those are removed first.
BDA Rating: 6 - Partial Usability (PU)
Damage Description:
- Abandonment: Due to the immobility caused by being stuck in the bomb crater, the tank was abandoned by its crew. The abandonment further exacerbates the situation, leaving the tank exposed and vulnerable to potential enemy actions.
Overall Assessment:
The Leopard 2A4 tank is rated as 6 - Partial Usability (PU) due to being stuck in a bomb crater and subsequently abandoned. While the tank retains its structural integrity and primary offensive capabilities, its mobility is severely compromised, rendering it ineffective for combat operations. Additionally, the abandonment of the tank poses a logistical challenge for recovery efforts and increases the risk of enemy exploitation.
Decision Making Justification:
Given the rating of 6 - Partial Usability (PU), immediate recovery efforts are required to extract the tank from the bomb crater and assess the extent of damage to its mobility systems. Once recovered, repairs can be initiated to restore the tank's mobility and operational capabilities. Furthermore, measures should be taken to secure the abandoned tank to prevent enemy access and potential salvage.
Leopard 2A4 lost in battle
2024.01.16 - 47.98628°N 37.33901°E
A Leopard 2A4 was damaged in battle, but also quickly evacuated. However it appears that much of the tank burned out.BDA Rating: 3 - Severely Impaired (SI)
Damage Description:
- Evacuation: The tank was quickly evacuated from the battlefield, indicating that there were no casualties among the crew. However, the extent of damage suggests that the tank may require extensive repairs or may even be irreparable.
- Fire Damage: The Leopard 2A4 sustained significant damage due to a fire during battle. Much of the tank appears to have burned out, resulting in severe structural damage and potentially rendering many components non-functional.
Overall Assessment:
The Leopard 2A4 tank is rated as 3 - Severely Impaired (SI) due to the catastrophic fire damage it sustained during battle. The extensive burning has likely rendered many critical components non-operational, making the tank unusable in its current state. While evacuation ensured the safety of the crew, the level of damage suggests that repairs may not be feasible in the field.
Decision Making Justification:
Given the rating of 3 - Severely Impaired (SI), immediate recovery efforts should focus on safely removing the tank from the battlefield. Once off-site, a thorough assessment of the damage should be conducted to determine the feasibility of repairs. Depending on the extent of the damage, it may be necessary to salvage usable components or consider the tank a total loss and seek a replacement.
Leopard 2A4 abandoned
2024.01.20 - 47.9135°N 37.45989°E
This Leopard 2A4 was disabled by a mine near the front line. The crew bails unharmed. Note that the driver bails over the commander hatch, as the ERA blocks are blocking the exit over the drivers hatch.
It appears the tanks engine remained operational and the tank shown of by the russian forces, after they repaired its track and suspension.
The russians present a review of the tank:
BDA Rating: 6 - Partial Usability (PU)
Damage Description:
- Mine Hit Damage: The Leopard 2A4 was disabled by a mine near the front line.
- Lancet Drone Strike: A Lancet drone strike targeted the tank's gun mantlet frontally from above.
Overall Assessment:
Considering the damage caused by the mine hit and the Lancet drone strike, the Leopard 2A4 tank is rated as 6 - Partial Usability (PU). The tank remains partially usable, with its primary offensive capabilities intact despite the damage to the gun mantlet. However, the immobility caused by the mine hit poses a significant operational limitation, requiring immediate recovery efforts before the tank can be fully operational again.
Decision Making Justification:
Given the rating of 6 - Partial Usability (PU), priority should be given to recovery efforts to restore mobility to the tank. Once the tank is mobile, further assessments can be made regarding the repair of the damaged gun mantlet.
Russia attempted to recover Strv 122
2024.01.19 - 49.08329°N 38.02574°E
Forbes Article
Notably, the two brem that towed the strv 122 were recovered. Maybe the undamaged one recovered the damaged one and left the tank behind.
Leopard 2A6 after mine damage
2024.01.20
id="" vehicleStatus=""> This Leopard 2A6 is parked on a German truck to be send off for repairs. There are two torn off road wheels on the right rear track. Notable is that the tank likely drove to the back line on its own power, with a in the field patched track.Interview @11:10
_002.png?id=3381469189&thumbnail=0x150)
_002.png?id=4790508224&thumbnail=0x150)
Leopard 2A4 lost driver hatch
2024.03.17
Damaged Leopard-2A4 - hit at the driver's hatch at the junction of turret and hull. Judging by the traces on the armor, the hit was probably a HEAT or an ATGM. Also the running gear of the tank was damaged by a mine explosion, but the track remained in place. The driver's hatch and sighting device was blown off, the resistance of hatches to high-explosive impact is one of the weak points of the Leopard-2A4, on subsequent modifications starting with the Leopard-2A5 the hatch was completely changed - a rectangular reinforced driver's hatch was installed, opening and closing of which is done by horizontal movement.
Leopard 2A4 destroyed
2023.10.26 - 47.43186°N 35.85959°E
This Leopard 2A4 was lost in one of the later smaller offensives in Fall 2023 near Robotyne.Leopard 2A4 abandoned
2024.03.27 - 47.43406°N 35.86738°E
2024.04.16
Leopard 2A4 with exposed bustle ammo rack - surrounded by Russian corpses.World record long range kill - Strv 122
2024.04.06
In an interview Ukraine tank commander reports they hit a moving BMP at 6500 meters at night (likely APFSDS), first shot hit it, and it burned out after rolling to a stop.This would make it the longest direct fire tank kill in the world.
While a Ukraine T-64 managed to destroy a Russia tank at a distance of just over 10.000 meters, this was done in indirect fire with drone corrections and multiple attempts. Here the Strv 122 manage to not just hit a moving target directly, but also did so in the first shot.
Leopard 2A4 decoy
2024.04.09
Russian drones targeted and hit a Leopard 2A4 decoy.
Leopard 2A4 disabled by Mine
2024.05.10 - 47.91324°N 37.42694°E
Leopard 2A4 disabledRecovered at the beginning of June 2024.
Leopard 2A4 disabled
2024.05.10 - 47.93441°N 37.42661°E
Leopard 2A4 was struck and burned on the left side
Leopard 2A4 disabled
2024.05.12
Leopard damage logs 21st Brigade
2024.05.18
Another document was leaked and lists damages that occurred on the Leopard tanks, both durning battle and maintenance related.At a later time we will try to associate these reports with the known footage we have documented.
| Nr. | Type | Factory Number | Serial Number | Fault | Date Out of Service | Repair Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Leopard-2A6 | 20869 | 600 | Battle damage* | Yampil | |
| 2 | Leopard-2A6 | 10692 | 610 | Battle damage* | 31.10.2023 | Cannot be pulled out |
| 3 | Leopard-2A6 | 20928 | 612 | Battle damage* | Yampil | |
| 4 | Leopard-2A6 | 20405 | 619 | Battle damage* | 09.03.2024 | Cannot be pulled out |
| 5 | Leopard-2A5 | 14089 | 635 | Battle damage* | 22.12.2023 | Cannot be pulled out |
| 6 | Leopard-2A5 | 14016 | 639 | Battle damage* | 20.01.2024 | Cannot be pulled out |
| 7 | Leopard-2A5 | 14045 | 636 | Battle damage* | 20.01.2024 | Cannot be pulled out |
| 8 | Leopard-2A6 | 10568 | 622 | The turret is broken, the fire control system is not working, engine not turning over (hydrolock), low oil pressure in gearbox | Factory | |
| 9 | Leopard-2A6 | L 12269 | 626 | Engine hydrolocked, short-circuited wiring and burned out (vehicle burnt) | Factory | |
| 10 | Leopard-2A6 | 20875 | 614 | Damaged, in major repair | Factory | |
| 11 | Leopard-2A6 | 11071 | 617 | Damaged, in major repair | Factory | |
| 12 | Leopard-2A6 | 20912 | 611 | Hit by artillery | Factory | |
| 13 | Leopard-2A6 | 11038 | 616 | Hit by artillery | Factory | |
| 14 | Leopard-2A6 | 10597 | 624 | Hit a mine, hit by artillery | Factory | |
| 15 | Leopard-2A6 | 11061 | 613 | Stuck on an obstacle, hit in the turret, starts but turret not working | 04.01.2024 | Factory |
| 16 | Leopard-2A5 | 14034 | 634 | Damaged | 05.11.2023 | Factory |
| 17 | Leopard-2A6 | 11074 | 621 | Damaged, covered by artillery | 13.12.2023 | Factory |
| 18 | Leopard-2A6 | 22167 | 623 | Damaged, burned, possibly blown up during evacuation 621 (needs replacement of filter element of air filter, commander's periscope not working, needs ZLHM (central computer in the turret bustle) replacement, replacement of balance bar, roller, and rubber pads on tracks) | 23.11.2023 | Factory |
| 19 | Leopard-2A5 | TO107027 30511 | 631 | Stuck on an obstacle, hit in the turret | 04.01.2024 | Factory |
| 20 | Leopard-2A5 | TO107027 30510 | 632 | Hit a mine | 09.12.2023 | Factory |
| 21 | Leopard-2A5 | 14057 | 637 | Damaged during evacuation (was stuck in the mud) | 10.12.2023 | Factory |
| 22 | Leopard-2A6 | 10611 | 618 | Control block not working, needs roller replacement | 09.01.2024 | VT3-TB |
| 23 | Leopard-2A6 | 20885 | 628 | Damaged: roller, thermal imager of the gunner, commander's periscope | 09.03.2024 | VT3-TB |
| 24 | Leopard-2A5 | 14051 | 630 | Damaged: internal communication block, water ingress | 04.03.2024 | VT3-TB |
| 25 | Leopard-2A6 | L 12206 | 625 | Damaged: roller | 31.03.2024 | VT3-TB |
120mm DM11 - Programming Module
2024.06.02
To enable the Leopard 2 to fire the modern DM11 Multipurpose HE round, a special programming module (Ammunition Communication Module) must be installed. With the Leopard 2A7 this became the new default. However it was for a long time unknown if and when the Leopard 2A6 had these modules retrofitted. As it turns out, whenever older tanks received a new barrel, this DM11 programming module was also installed.Previously it was believed that the Leopard 2s send to Ukraine did not have this module, but now we have new evidence.
Here you can see the Programming module installed ontop of the gun on the Portuguese Leopard 2A6 (3x of which were donated to Ukraine).
On the right picture you can see the Strv 122 donated to Ukraine, these however appear to be lacking the programming module.
Leopard 2A4 disabled by FPV
2024.06.14 - 47.91317°N 37.427°E
Leopard 2A6 immobilized by mine
2024.06.21
This Portuguese Leopard 2A6 was immobilized by a mine hit on its right side. The ATGM in the video likely targeted the tank filming and simply missed.Its fairly clear that the ATGM hit nowhere near any of the tanks.
According to the poster of the video, the Leopard was recovered shortly afterwards.
Leopard 2A4 Delivery
2024.07.13
Spanish MoD10x more Leopard 2A4 were refurbished in Spain at the Santa Bárbara Sistemas factory in Alcalá de Guadaira (Seville) and were transferred to Ukraine.
The 14x Leopard 2 pledged in 2023 are now confirmed for delivery in the coming months Twitter.
| Country | Model | Quantity | Delivery Dates | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Germany | Leopard 2A6 | 18 | March 2023 | |
| Portugal | Leopard 2A6 | 3 | March 2023 | |
| Sweden | Strv 122 | 10 | March 2023 | |
| Poland | Leopard 2A4 | 14 | February 2023 and March 2023 | |
| Norway | Leopard 2A4 | 8 | March 2023 | |
| Spain | Leopard 2A4 | 10 | 6x April 2023 and 4x July 2023 | |
| Canada | Leopard 2A4M CAN | 8 | November 2023 | |
| Netherlands/Denmark | Leopard 2A4 | 14 | Pledged, not yet delivered | |
| *New* Spain | Leopard 2A4 | 10 | July 2024 | |
| Total Delivered: 50x Leopard 2A4 tanks, 21x Leopard 2A6 and 10x Strv 122 | ||||
Leopard 2A4 stuck in crater
2024.07.27
Leopard 2A4 targeted by FPV
2024.07.29
Leopard 2A4 bustle fire
2024.07.30 - 47.90466°N 37.43404°E
This Leopard 2A4 operates near Pobjeda, when it is targeted by artillery and hit 3 times by FPV drones. The 2nd FPV hits the turret bustle resulting in a contained ammunition fire.Leopard 2A4 bustle fire
Due to the lack of unique landmarks this footage could be older archive material of a known loss thats being newly published, but it could also be a new loss. We will update this once more information is available. This Leopard 2A4 appears to be burning somewhere in the middle of a field. It is not clear if this is the storage boxes or the turret ammunition thats burning.Leopard 2A4 weak points
2024.09.08
Leopard 2A4 river crossing
2024.09.11
Training of Ukrainian tank crews of the 33rd separate mechanized brigades of the Ground Forces of the Armed Forces of Ukraine in between combat work in Donetsk region. armyinform.com
Leopard 2A6 in Kurks
2024.09.16
Leopard 2A6 was spotted according to the person recording the video in offensive operations in Kursk or near the border. Later videos show that the 21st Brigade broke through the russian border, suffering losses in the form of a CV9040, a Marder and some MRAPs.
Leopard 2A6 hit mine and destroyed by FPV
2024.09.19 - 51.41343°N 35.19527°E
A Leopard 2A6 was disabled by a mine (missing front right roadwheel) near the village of Sheptukhovka (20km deep inside Russia) in the Kursk region. Afterwards this Leopard 2A6 was hit by drones and suffered an ammunition fire in the crew compartment.The Video footage suggests that the ammunition fire was by an FPV drone hitting the upper front plate.
Analysis of the FPV strikes.
Drone 1 - Lower front plate - No Perforation
The first FPV drone struck the tank from the front on the lower front plate and likely did not perforate. A Perforation in combination with the internal fire would have resulted in smoke or fire exiting from the hole and would have left visible residue, similar to what can be seen on the upper front plate.
Drone 2 - Left Turret Bustle - Destroyed Left Smoke Launcher
This drone impacted on the smoke launcher, blowing it off and possibly hitting the turret roof above the tracks near the ABC-System.
Drone 3 - Upper Front plate: Penetration
This last FPV drone likely impacted and perforated the 32mm upper front plate, striking the ammunition and resulting in an ammunition fire.
Leopard 2A6 hit
2024.09.22
Leopard 2A6 with ERA hit by FPV
2024.09.29
A Leopard 2A6 with ERA installed on the side and a foldable netting on the roof was likely filmed in the Kurks region being hit by a russian FPV drone in the rear.Leopard 2A6 under fire evacuating T-72
2024.09.29 - 51.25352°N 34.53317°E
Leopard 2 which took some enemy hits and had burning turret pulls out from the battlefield damaged friendly T-72 at the Russian border of Kursk. A nearby impact ignited the smoke launchers on the turret, causing them to burn/smoke.Leopard 2A6 hit by FPV using glasfiber
2024.09.30
This FPV drone, based on the quality of the video footage is likely using glasfiber. It struck this Leopard 2A6 from behind in the turret bustle, the trajectory of the warhead intersects a small part of the ammunition storage in the bustle, so an ammunition fire might be a possible result of this attack.
Leopard 2A6 Interview
2024.10.19
- Leopard 2 Performance:
- The Leopard 2 main battle tank is praised for its modern design, spaciousness, and user-friendly controls, such as joysticks and screens, making it easy to operate.
- The optics allow the crew to see targets at a distance of up to 3600 meters, offering superior range compared to Soviet-era tanks like the T72, which had a maximum range of around 1000 meters.
- The Leopard 2 is highly maneuverable, fast, and equipped with a reverse gear, which is highly beneficial in combat.
- Its hit accuracy at 3 km is nearly 100%, and it has a maximum speed of 72 km/h, though the speedometer showed up to 80 km/h at times.
- Leopard 2 Issues:
- The tank does not have an automatic loading system, requiring the loader to manually handle 30 kg shells, which is physically demanding.
- There have been supply shortages, particularly with high-explosive shells, forcing crews to conserve ammunition.
- During combat, the Leopard 2A6 withstood damage on multiple occasions:
- The turrets lost power when a power cable was severed, but they managed to retreat, as the engine was not affected by it.
- It survived drone attacks, as well as a mine that broke its track, but the crew remained unharmed.
- An anti-tank missile hit the tank, but it continued to function.
- Comparison with Soviet Tanks:
- Leopard 2 offers better protection for its crew. Unlike Soviet tanks where ammunition storage explosions lead to complete destruction, Leopard 2 has a safety system that directs any fire upwards, preventing harm to the crew.
- Survivability is significantly improved, with crew members surviving direct hits multiple times, whereas Russian tanks have a high risk of catastrophic ammunition explosions.
Leopard 2A4 ambushing column
2024.10.21 - 47.95016°N 37.36172°E
Russian convoy: from 47.95334°N 37.40543°E to 47.95801°N 37.37849°EIn the Donetsk region near Kurakhove, a Leopard 2A4 by the 33rd Mechanized Brigade ambushed multiple vehicles, and hit a Russian MRAP and BMP.
Leopard 2A4 ambushing column part 2
2024.10.23 - 47.94989°N 37.37058°E
Russian BTR-80: 47.95613°N 37.37291°EIn the Donetsk region near Kurakhove, a Leopard 2A4 previously ambushed a russian convoy. It is likely that this is the follow up footage showing the Leopard 2A4 hunting the vehicles from the column after they were scattered.
The Leopard 2A4 clip edited into this video likely doesn't depict the tank actually firing the shot shown in the video, as the turret position, tree line, and the direction from which the BTR-80 is hit don't align with the terrain.
A destroyed T-90M can be seen in the background.
Leopard 2A4 combating infantry
2024.10.25 - 47.9159°N 37.40349°E
We come to you with a new report on the work of our Leo 2A4🐆 The occupiers are hiding in shelters from the brigade's means of destruction. They were sure to see how effective modern types of weapons are - unmanned systems. But no one canceled the good "old school" approach and dance Close by, our avengers of the tank battalion worked on the Russians and drove back safely. Waiting for new victims of holy revenge against the occupiersLeopard 2A4 flushing out infantry at close range
2024.11.10
Leopard 2A4 shooting houses and BMPs
2024.11.11 - 47.94982°N 37.26523°E
A fleeing BMP is shot at: 47.94488°N 37.28464°EThis Leopard of the 33rd brigade is engaging 350 meters south of its position, russian infantry, that attempt to gain a foothold in the village.
Leopard 2A4 hit by Lancet
2024.11.12 - 47.97122°N 37.27726°E
Leopard 2A4 immobilized by Lancet
2024.11.12 - 47.96991°N 37.22011°E
Leopard 2A4 decoy
2024.11.13
Leopard 2A4 captured
2024.11.13
Leopard 2A4 captured
2024.11.13
This is likely a known loss, however it is challenging to identify the correct origin.
Leopard 2A4 ambushing T-72 column
2024.11.13 - 47.94622°N 37.29944°E
Analysis of the engagment.
Frame by Frame analysis:
The column was initially spotted around 10km from the point of contact. At this stage the column had 8 vehicles (2x T-72, rest are APCs or similar), later however this dropped to 6. It is unclear if these might be just support vehicles, or if they were taken out of action by artillery or malfunctions.
The Leopard 2A4 engaged the remaining vehicle at a distance of around 2900 meters.
800 meters / (14 Frame /30Frame/s) = 1714 meter/second
It appears the the lower front plate was struck and the left frontal fuel tank of the T-72 was perforated and ignited.
- Nr. 1 T-72 destroyed in 3 shots
- Nr. 3 APC damaged/destroyed in 1 shot
- Nr. 5 APC damaged/destroyed in 2 shots
- Nr. 2 T-72 only hit turtle armor, missing the tank itself
33rd Interview - nv.ua
2024.11.12
Ukraine’s Leopards take on Russian armor in Kurakhove battle- Background:
- NV journalist Serhii Okunev interviews soldiers of Ukraine's 33rd Separate Mechanized Brigade, operating near Kurakhove, Donetsk.
- Western tanks, particularly Leopard 2s, are increasingly used in combat due to their effectiveness.
- Strategic Shift:
- 2022-2023: Initial hope that Leopard 2 tanks would help in Ukraine's counteroffensive.
- By fall 2024: Shift to a defensive strategy, particularly important in holding lines near Kurakhove.
- Defensive Success:
- The 33rd Brigade has effectively slowed or stopped Russian advances in their sector, despite increased attacks.
- Leopard 2 tanks were used to counter a significant Russian armored push in October.
- Leopard 2 tanks engage Russian armor directly, creating deterrence in a challenging environment.
- Tank Engagements and Effectiveness:
- Footage shows Leopard 2 tanks targeting Russian armored vehicles, often in tank-on-tank battles.
- The Leopard's precision allows Ukrainian crews to accurately hit enemy armor even from long distances.
- Frequent engagements with Russian forces increase the need for Leopard tanks on the Kurakhove front.
- Tank Crew Experiences:
- "Kuba" and "Boroda," two Leopard 2 crew members, share their frontline experiences.
- They have become more confident in their tasks, praising the tank's precision and the impact on Russian morale.
- Ammunition Rack Repair and Safety:
- One Leopard tank suffered an enemy drone strike on its ammo compartment, causing a fire.
- Repairability: Unlike Soviet tanks, the Leopard's design prevents catastrophic explosions; the tank was repaired and returned to action.
- The Leopard's ammo storage design minimizes risks to the crew, avoiding the deadly turret explosions seen in Soviet tanks.
ArmyInform Interview
2024.11.12
The crew destroyed two Russian tanks with three shots, the Leopard survived 8 drone hits: 'Marine' about German tank battles- Introduction to Andriy and His Role
- Name: Andriy, 35, Senior Sergeant
- Background: Returned to service as a tank instructor after being injured, training with Leopard 2A4 tanks.
- Setting: Conducting field exercises at dawn on a training ground, managing firing accuracy adjustments.
- Differences Between Ukrainian and European Training
- European Training: Often theoretical with instructors lacking practical combat experience.
- Ukrainian Adaptation: Practical, combat-focused adjustments to European methodologies to fit real frontline conditions.
- Combat Experience with Leopard Tanks
- Tactical Successes: Andriy's crew has destroyed enemy armored vehicles, including tanks and infantry positions at close range.
- Tank Advantages: Leopard tanks excel in speed and accuracy, allowing rapid engagement and efficient enemy neutralization.
- Surviving Hits and Tank Resilience
- Tank Durability: Andriy highlights that Leopards are notably resilient:
- Survived 8 drone hits from FPV drones and remained repairable.
- Leopard tanks are built with critical safety features: a titanium bulkhead separates the crew compartment from the ammunition, reducing risk to the crew and making these tanks extremely difficult to destroy.
- Real Combat Example: Andriy’s crew destroyed two Russian tanks with three shots, surviving counter-attacks due to the Leopard's sturdy design.
- Experience Under Attack: Describes an incident where his tank was struck by an anti-tank guided missile (ATGM) while retreating, leading to temporary unconsciousness but successful evacuation without fatal injuries.
- Tank Durability: Andriy highlights that Leopards are notably resilient:
- Impressions of Leopard vs. Soviet Tanks
- Preference for Leopard: Andriy expresses a strong preference for the Leopard’s advanced capabilities and survivability over Soviet-era tanks like the T-72.
- Future Operations: Although his current role is as an instructor, he insists that if he returns to active combat, he would only want to use a Leopard tank due to its superior resilience.
Leopard 2A4 shooting trench
2024.11.14 - 47.91749°N 37.40934°E
Leopard 2A4 targeted by FPV
2024.11.21
Leopard 2A6 after 12 hits by FPVs
2024.11.23
Yuriy "Shustryy" is a member of the 🇩🇪Leopard 2A6 tank crew in the 🇺🇦21st separate mechanized brigade. His crew cleared several forest strips from the enemy, withstood 12 hits and managed to leave the battlefield on its own. His tank broke through three forest strips, after which it came under heavy enemy fire. Everything was flying at the Leopard: shells, ATGMs and FPV drones. After several hits, the tank's gun failed, the EW station stopped working, and the observation devices were destroyed. The vehicle could only maneuver. The crew, practically "blindly" and under enemy fire, left the battlefield, broke through landings, and destroyed enemy positions. In total, the Leopard had 12 hits, but the tank returned to its own. "Thanks to our tank — it survived," says "Shustryy".
Analysis of the FPV impacts.
Note that the hole in the top right is where a bolt was seated, it likely broke under the stress of the impact of some explosive directly above it. Unclear if caused by a failed FPV drone or artillery.
Leopard 2A6 decoy hit by a guided bomb
2024.11.26
Leopard 2A6 hit in engine FPV-Fiber
2024.12.03 - 51.25452°N 35.02481°E
This Leopard 2A6 was hit in the engine by an FPV drone using opticalfiber and was immobilized.After the tank was abandoned a second drone struck the tank with a payload of two RPG warheads. A third drone also approached the tank, but its unclear if and where the drone struck the tank.